Comparison Overview

Best Label Company, Inc.

VS

V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company

Best Label Company, Inc.

13260 Moore Street, Cerritos, CA 90703, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bestlabel.com

Best Label prints labels and tags for multiple different industries. Food & Beverage, Health & Beauty, Pharmaceutical, Nutraceutical, Agriculture, Marketing Collateral, Direct Mail & Forms. They print using the latest flexographic high definition plates have many different print methods including rotary letterpress, silkscreen and inline rotary foil stamping. ISO:9001 and FIRST Company Certified.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company

200 North Elevar Street, Oxnard, CA, 93030, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.printv3.com/

V3 is one of California's oldest Commercial Printing companies and was named to Inc. Magazine's List of 5,000 Fastest-Growing private companies. V3’s history dates back to the 1920’s and our mission is to fill the void left between your typical local print shop that comes up short on resources and the much larger publicly held companies that answer to Wall Street Analyst. V3 is known for its fanatical attention to detail and for building teams of individuals who have a passion for their work. As a result V3 has put together teams to support three specific areas of service; Sales & Marketing Collateral (General Commercial Printing), Direct Mail and Paperboard Product Packaging.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-label-company-inc-.jpeg
Best Label Company, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/v3.jpeg
V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Best Label Company, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Label Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company in 2025.

Incident History — Best Label Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Label Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-label-company-inc-.jpeg
Best Label Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/v3.jpeg
V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Best Label Company, Inc. company and V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Best Label Company, Inc. company.

In the current year, V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company and Best Label Company, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company nor Best Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company nor Best Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company nor Best Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. company nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. company nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company company employs more people globally than Best Label Company, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor V3 Printing - a National Graphics Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References