Comparison Overview

Best Label Company, Inc.

VS

CMYK Printing

Best Label Company, Inc.

13260 Moore Street, Cerritos, CA 90703, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Best Label prints labels and tags for multiple different industries. Food & Beverage, Health & Beauty, Pharmaceutical, Nutraceutical, Agriculture, Marketing Collateral, Direct Mail & Forms. They print using the latest flexographic high definition plates have many different print methods including rotary letterpress, silkscreen and inline rotary foil stamping. ISO:9001 and FIRST Company Certified.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CMYK Printing

180 Coolidge Avenue, Englewood, New Jersey, 07631, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At CMYK we offer the best printing for NJ Businesses. We are not some anonymous printing company that clients don’t get to know over the long haul. Rather we work hard to build long-term relationships with clients who have grown to appreciate our dedication to excellent work and our boutique-style approach. Our client list includes manufacturers, universities, advertising agencies, automotive accounts, and financial, cosmetic and fashion companies. We are the trusted partner of print buyers. At CMYK, the details matter and it shows in our work. To learn more about how CMYK can help you, feel free to contact us 201-458-1300 or visit our website online at www.CMYKPrinting.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-label-company-inc-.jpeg
Best Label Company, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cmyk-printing.jpeg
CMYK Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Best Label Company, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CMYK Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Label Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CMYK Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Best Label Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Label Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CMYK Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CMYK Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-label-company-inc-.jpeg
Best Label Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cmyk-printing.jpeg
CMYK Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CMYK Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Best Label Company, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CMYK Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Best Label Company, Inc. company.

In the current year, CMYK Printing company and Best Label Company, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CMYK Printing company nor Best Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CMYK Printing company nor Best Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CMYK Printing company nor Best Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. company nor CMYK Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor CMYK Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. company nor CMYK Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Best Label Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than CMYK Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor CMYK Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor CMYK Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor CMYK Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor CMYK Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor CMYK Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Best Label Company, Inc. nor CMYK Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N