Comparison Overview

Berkshire Hathaway

VS

ICICI Lombard

Berkshire Hathaway

US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

None

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 6,832
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ICICI Lombard

ICICI Lombard House 414, P Balu Marg Near Siddhi Vinayak Temple, Prabhadevi , Mumbai , Maharashtra, 400025, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

About ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited ICICI Lombard is the leading private general insurance company in the country. The Company offers a comprehensive and well-diversified range of products through multiple distribution channels, including motor, health, crop, fire, personal accident, marine, engineering, and liability insurance. With a legacy of over 2 decades, ICICI Lombard is committed to customer centricity with its brand philosophy of ‘Nibhaaye Vaade’. The company has issued over 36.2 million policies, honoured over 2.9 million claims and has a Gross Written Premium (GWP) of ₹ 255.94 billion for the year ended March 31, 2024. ICICI Lombard has 312 branches and 13,670 employees, as on March 31, 2024. ICICI Lombard has been a pioneer in the industry and is the first large scale insurance company in India to migrate its entire core systems to cloud. With a strong focus on being digital led and agile, it has launched a plethora of tech-driven innovations, including the industry first Face Scan on its signature insurance and wellness App - IL TakeCare, with over 9 million downloads. The company has won several laurels including ET Corporate Excellence Awards, Golden Peacock Awards, FICCI Insurance Awards, Assocham, Stevie Asia Pacific, National CSR awards etc. for its various initiatives. For more details log on to www.icicilombard.com

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 13,539
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Berkshire Hathaway
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-lombard.jpeg
ICICI Lombard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Berkshire Hathaway
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICICI Lombard
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berkshire Hathaway in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICICI Lombard in 2025.

Incident History — Berkshire Hathaway (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berkshire Hathaway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICICI Lombard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICICI Lombard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Berkshire Hathaway
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-lombard.jpeg
ICICI Lombard
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Berkshire Hathaway company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ICICI Lombard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ICICI Lombard company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Berkshire Hathaway company.

In the current year, ICICI Lombard company and Berkshire Hathaway company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICICI Lombard company nor Berkshire Hathaway company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ICICI Lombard company nor Berkshire Hathaway company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ICICI Lombard company nor Berkshire Hathaway company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway company nor ICICI Lombard company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ICICI Lombard company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Berkshire Hathaway company.

ICICI Lombard company employs more people globally than Berkshire Hathaway company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H