Berkshire Hathaway
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 800 and 849
None
NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 6,832
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Comparison Overview
Berkshire Hathaway
VS
Farmers Insurance
Farmers Insurance
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 550 and 599
The companies comprising the Farmers Insurance Group of Companies® currently make up one of the country's largest insurers of vehicles, homes and small businesses, and provide a wide range of other specialty insurance and financial services products. In business since 1928, today at Farmers® we proudly serve more than 10 million households with more than 19 million individual insurance policies across all 50 states through the efforts of nearly 48,000 exclusive and independent agents and approximately 21,000 employees. Our experience provides a rich history and legacy of service and strong customer relationships, while our focus on smart innovation, technology and entrepreneurship helps us to stay creative, to continually improve our product offerings and to drive the evolution of the insurance industry. Farmers Insurance Exchange®, the largest of the three primary insurance insurers that make up Farmers Insurance, is recognized as one of the largest U.S. companies on the 2017 Fortune 500 list. At Farmers®, we understand that every encounter with customers is an opportunity to differentiate ourselves with our personalized service and have an overall positive impact on their lives. We pride ourselves on helping the individuals and businesses we serve become smarter and better prepared to protect the things that matter most to them. We are also deeply committed to giving back. The Farmers culture is built around opportunities to volunteer and help improve the communities in which we work and live.
NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 44,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Berkshire Hathaway
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Farmers Insurance
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Berkshire Hathaway
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Farmers Insurance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Berkshire Hathaway in 2025.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)
Farmers Insurance has 150.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History — Berkshire Hathaway (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Berkshire Hathaway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Farmers Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Farmers Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Berkshire Hathaway
Incidents
No Incident
Farmers Insurance
Incidents
Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: phishing emails, exploited software vulnerabilities (Salesforce), credential harvesting
Motivation: financial gain, data theft for phishing/scams, potential espionage (agricultural data)
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party vendor compromise (unauthorized database access)
Blog: Blog
FAQ
Berkshire Hathaway company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Farmers Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Farmers Insurance company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Berkshire Hathaway company has not reported any.
In the current year, Farmers Insurance company has reported more cyber incidents than Berkshire Hathaway company.
Neither Farmers Insurance company nor Berkshire Hathaway company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Farmers Insurance company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Berkshire Hathaway company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither Farmers Insurance company nor Berkshire Hathaway company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway company nor Farmers Insurance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor Farmers Insurance holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway company nor Farmers Insurance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.
Farmers Insurance company employs more people globally than Berkshire Hathaway company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor Farmers Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor Farmers Insurance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor Farmers Insurance holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor Farmers Insurance holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor Farmers Insurance holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor Farmers Insurance holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description
A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
