Comparison Overview

Berkeley Christian Counselors

VS

CM Counsel Inc

Berkeley Christian Counselors

2407 Dana St, None, Berkeley, California, US, 94704
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Berkeley Christian Counselors is a fee-for-service counseling center that provides professional counseling services to clients in the Bay Area and throughout California. Our clients are diverse in many ways, including age, race, gender, sexual orientation, faith, work and personal background. We help clients address a range of issues including low self-esteem, anxiety, depression, loneliness, relational challenges, marital conflicts, trauma, addiction, grief and more. We also offer premarital counseling as well as therapeutic and educational groups on a wide array of spiritual, emotional, and psychological issues. As a training institute, we provide on-going consultation for Christian licensed counselors as well as supervision for Associates and Trainees working toward licensure.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CM Counsel Inc

523 Plymouth Road, Suite 215, Plymouth Meeting, PA, US, 19462
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

CM Counsel is large multisite outpatient behavioral health practice with more than 20 years' experience providing clients with quality and compassionate care. We are proud to offer timely access to our board-certified psychiatrists as well as our highly qualified therapists who specialize in evidence-based treatment modalities and we accept most commercial insurance plans as well as Medicare. In addition to our offices in Plymouth Meeting, King of Prussia, and Exton, we are pleased to offer telehealth and telepsychiatry visits through a HIPAA-compliant platform, allowing continuity of treatment and access to care during very uncertain times.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/berkeleychristiancounselors.jpeg
Berkeley Christian Counselors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cm-counsel.jpeg
CM Counsel Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Berkeley Christian Counselors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CM Counsel Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berkeley Christian Counselors in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CM Counsel Inc in 2026.

Incident History — Berkeley Christian Counselors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berkeley Christian Counselors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CM Counsel Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CM Counsel Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/berkeleychristiancounselors.jpeg
Berkeley Christian Counselors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cm-counsel.jpeg
CM Counsel Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Berkeley Christian Counselors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CM Counsel Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CM Counsel Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Berkeley Christian Counselors company.

In the current year, CM Counsel Inc company and Berkeley Christian Counselors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CM Counsel Inc company nor Berkeley Christian Counselors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CM Counsel Inc company nor Berkeley Christian Counselors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CM Counsel Inc company nor Berkeley Christian Counselors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors company nor CM Counsel Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors nor CM Counsel Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors company nor CM Counsel Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CM Counsel Inc company employs more people globally than Berkeley Christian Counselors company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors nor CM Counsel Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors nor CM Counsel Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors nor CM Counsel Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors nor CM Counsel Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors nor CM Counsel Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Berkeley Christian Counselors nor CM Counsel Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H