Comparison Overview

BentoML

VS

Meituan

BentoML

650 California St, 6 fl, San Francisco, California, US, 94108
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bentoml.com

BentoML is an enterprise-grade Inference platform for deploying and managing AI models at scale. It offers full control without the complexity, allowing teams to serve any model including LLMs, embeddings, and agentic pipelines across VPC, on-prem, or hybrid environments with tailored optimization, advanced orchestration, and fine-grained performance tuning. From prototype to production, BentoML covers the full inference lifecycle with instant model deployments, elastic autoscaling, built-in observability, compliance-ready features, and mission-critical reliability, freeing your team to deliver AI that drives real business outcomes faster.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Meituan

Wangjing International R&D Park, No.6 Wangjing East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CN, 100102
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.meituan.com/en-US/about-us

Adhering to the ‘Retail + Technology’ strategy, Meituan commits to its mission that 'We help people eat better, live better'. Since its establishment in March 2010, Meituan has advanced the digital upgrading of services and goods retail on both supply and demand sides. Together with our partners we provide quality services for consumers. On 20 September, 2018, Meituan was listed on the Main Board of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong. Meituan has always put customers first, and continuously increased its R&D investment in new technologies. Meituan will join hands with all partners to fulfill our social responsibility and create more values for the society.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 38,959
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bentoml.jpeg
BentoML
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meituan.jpeg
Meituan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BentoML
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meituan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

BentoML has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meituan in 2025.

Incident History — BentoML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BentoML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meituan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meituan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bentoml.jpeg
BentoML
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meituan.jpeg
Meituan
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2018
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Meituan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BentoML company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BentoML and Meituan have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, BentoML company has reported more cyber incidents than Meituan company.

Neither Meituan company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Meituan company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Meituan company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

BentoML company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Meituan company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BentoML nor Meituan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Meituan company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BentoML company.

Meituan company employs more people globally than BentoML company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither BentoML nor Meituan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Meituan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Meituan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Meituan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BentoML nor Meituan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BentoML nor Meituan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References