Comparison Overview

BentoML

VS

Databricks

BentoML

650 California St, 6 fl, San Francisco, California, US, 94108
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bentoml.com

BentoML is an enterprise-grade Inference platform for deploying and managing AI models at scale. It offers full control without the complexity, allowing teams to serve any model including LLMs, embeddings, and agentic pipelines across VPC, on-prem, or hybrid environments with tailored optimization, advanced orchestration, and fine-grained performance tuning. From prototype to production, BentoML covers the full inference lifecycle with instant model deployments, elastic autoscaling, built-in observability, compliance-ready features, and mission-critical reliability, freeing your team to deliver AI that drives real business outcomes faster.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Databricks

160 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://databricks.com

Databricks is the Data and AI company. More than 10,000 organizations worldwide — including Block, Comcast, Condé Nast, Rivian, Shell and over 60% of the Fortune 500 — rely on the Databricks Data Intelligence Platform to take control of their data and put it to work with AI. Databricks is headquartered in San Francisco, with offices around the globe, and was founded by the original creators of Lakehouse, Apache Spark™, Delta Lake and MLflow. --- Databricks applicants Please apply through our official Careers page at databricks.com/company/careers. All official communication from Databricks will come from email addresses ending with @databricks.com or @goodtime.io (our meeting tool).

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,527
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bentoml.jpeg
BentoML
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/databricks.jpeg
Databricks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BentoML
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Databricks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

BentoML has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Databricks in 2025.

Incident History — BentoML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BentoML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Databricks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Databricks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bentoml.jpeg
BentoML
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/databricks.jpeg
Databricks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Databricks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BentoML company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BentoML company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Databricks company has not reported any.

In the current year, BentoML company has reported more cyber incidents than Databricks company.

Neither Databricks company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Databricks company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Databricks company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

BentoML company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Databricks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BentoML nor Databricks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BentoML company nor Databricks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Databricks company employs more people globally than BentoML company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither BentoML nor Databricks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Databricks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Databricks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Databricks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BentoML nor Databricks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BentoML nor Databricks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References