Comparison Overview

BentoML

VS

Canva

BentoML

650 California St, 6 fl, San Francisco, California, US, 94108
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bentoml.com

BentoML is an enterprise-grade Inference platform for deploying and managing AI models at scale. It offers full control without the complexity, allowing teams to serve any model including LLMs, embeddings, and agentic pipelines across VPC, on-prem, or hybrid environments with tailored optimization, advanced orchestration, and fine-grained performance tuning. From prototype to production, BentoML covers the full inference lifecycle with instant model deployments, elastic autoscaling, built-in observability, compliance-ready features, and mission-critical reliability, freeing your team to deliver AI that drives real business outcomes faster.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Canva

Kippax St, Surry Hills, New South Wales, AU, 2010
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 600 and 649
http://www.canva.com

We're a global online visual communications platform on a mission to empower the world to design. Featuring a simple drag-and-drop user interface and a vast range of templates ranging from presentations, documents, websites, social media graphics, posters, apparel to videos, plus a huge library of fonts, stock photography, illustrations, video footage, and audio clips, anyone can take an idea and create something beautiful on Canva on any device, from anywhere in the world. Since our launch in 2013, we’ve had the crazy big goal of making design accessible to everyone. We were founded on the belief that people shouldn't need to understand complex software to unlock their creativity. We’re leveling the playing field and democratizing access to design and visual communication by empowering 100% of the world to communicate in a way that was once limited to the 1%. We've always had a deeper mission surrounding Canva — which we talk about as our 'simple' two-step plan: to build one of the world’s most valuable companies, and to do the most good we possibly can. We're committed to our core value of Being a Force for Good, so as the value of our company grows, so too does our ability to have a positive impact on the world.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 13,869
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bentoml.jpeg
BentoML
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canva.jpeg
Canva
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BentoML
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Canva
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

BentoML has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Canva has 250.88% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — BentoML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BentoML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Canva (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bentoml.jpeg
BentoML
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canva.jpeg
Canva
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials, Hardcoded Secrets in Code/Repositories, GitHub Action Token Theft, Lateral Movement via Exposed API Keys
Motivation: Financial Gain (via Ransomware/Extortion), Data Exfiltration for Dark Web Sales, Supply Chain Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

BentoML company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canva company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Canva company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to BentoML company.

In the current year, Canva company has reported more cyber incidents than BentoML company.

Neither Canva company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Canva company has disclosed at least one data breach, while BentoML company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Canva company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

BentoML company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Canva company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BentoML nor Canva holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BentoML company nor Canva company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Canva company employs more people globally than BentoML company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither BentoML nor Canva holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Canva holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Canva holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BentoML nor Canva holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BentoML nor Canva holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BentoML nor Canva holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References