Comparison Overview

BentoML

VS

ByteDance

BentoML

650 California St, 6 fl, San Francisco, California, US, 94108
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bentoml.com

BentoML is an enterprise-grade Inference platform for deploying and managing AI models at scale. It offers full control without the complexity, allowing teams to serve any model including LLMs, embeddings, and agentic pipelines across VPC, on-prem, or hybrid environments with tailored optimization, advanced orchestration, and fine-grained performance tuning. From prototype to production, BentoML covers the full inference lifecycle with instant model deployments, elastic autoscaling, built-in observability, compliance-ready features, and mission-critical reliability, freeing your team to deliver AI that drives real business outcomes faster.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

ByteDance

China, China, CN, 100098
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://job.bytedance.com/en/#/

ByteDance is a global incubator of platforms at the cutting edge of commerce, content, entertainment and enterprise services - over 2.5bn people interact with ByteDance products including TikTok. Creation is the core of ByteDance's purpose. Our products are built to help imaginations thrive. This is doubly true of the teams that make our innovations possible. Together, we inspire creativity and enrich life - a mission we aim towards achieving every day. At ByteDance, we create together and grow together. That's how we drive impact - for ourselves, our company, and the users we serve. We are committed to building a safe, healthy and positive online environment for all our users. We have over 110,000 employees based in more than 30 countries globally. Join us.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 45,557
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bentoml.jpeg
BentoML
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bytedance.jpeg
ByteDance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BentoML
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ByteDance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

BentoML has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

ByteDance has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — BentoML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BentoML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ByteDance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ByteDance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bentoml.jpeg
BentoML
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bytedance.jpeg
ByteDance
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Regulatory Compliance
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ByteDance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BentoML company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BentoML and ByteDance have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, ByteDance and BentoML have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Neither ByteDance company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ByteDance company nor BentoML company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

ByteDance company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while BentoML company has not reported such incidents publicly.

BentoML company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while ByteDance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BentoML nor ByteDance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BentoML company nor ByteDance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ByteDance company employs more people globally than BentoML company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither BentoML nor ByteDance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BentoML nor ByteDance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BentoML nor ByteDance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BentoML nor ByteDance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BentoML nor ByteDance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BentoML nor ByteDance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References