Comparison Overview

American Benefits Council

VS

Libertad y Progreso

American Benefits Council

1501 M Street NW, Washington, DC, US, 20005
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The American Benefits Council (the Council) is recognized as the preeminent advocate of employer-sponsored benefit programs in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to be the most effective advocate for voluntary private employee benefits. Our members either sponsor directly, administer or service retirement, health and stock compensation plans covering more than 100 million Americans. We are major corporations sponsoring comprehensive and diverse benefit plans. We are professionals in the benefits field with expertise in investments, retirement, health insurance, accounting, actuarial science, banking, law, and benefits consulting who provide service and support to corporate benefit plan sponsors. The Council initiates and champions legislation and regulations favorable to our members'​ needs and interests, and influences policy development within Congress and the White House and executive branch agencies. We fend off policy proposals that add burdens, liabilities and costs for the employer plan sponsor community. We serve as a technical resource on benefits issues for lawmakers, the media and other industry trade associations. We also lead other public policy organizations in developing and communicating a collective business community position and forge alliances on benefits issues. We are an active participant as a "friend of the court"​ in judicial cases affecting benefits.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Libertad y Progreso

Lavalle 636, 5º piso, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1047AAN, AR
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Libertad y Progreso es un centro de investigación en políticas públicas. Somos la fusión de CIIMA, Foro Republicano y Futuro Argentino. En Libertad y Progreso investigamos, desarrollamos y promovemos políticas públicas aplicadas a resolver los problemas de la ciudadanía, desde los valores y principios de la República Representativa Federal. Somos una fundación sin fines de lucro, privada e independiente de todo grupo político, religioso, empresarial o gubernamental. No aceptamos dinero del Estado. Nuestra VISIÓN es la de... ... una Argentina transformada en una sociedad abierta basada en el respeto por los derechos individuales, gobierno limitado, propiedad privada, mercados libres y paz. Nuestra MISIÓN es: Contribuir al cambio profundo de la Argentina, trabajando en el desarrollo de políticas públicas, elevando el nivel de discusión y promoviendo la participación ciudadana en el debate público sobre el rol del Estado en nuestra sociedad.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benefitscouncil.jpeg
American Benefits Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/libertad-y-progreso.jpeg
Libertad y Progreso
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Benefits Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Libertad y Progreso
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Benefits Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Libertad y Progreso in 2025.

Incident History — American Benefits Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Benefits Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Libertad y Progreso (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Libertad y Progreso cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benefitscouncil.jpeg
American Benefits Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/libertad-y-progreso.jpeg
Libertad y Progreso
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Libertad y Progreso company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Benefits Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Libertad y Progreso company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Benefits Council company.

In the current year, Libertad y Progreso company and American Benefits Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Libertad y Progreso company nor American Benefits Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Libertad y Progreso company nor American Benefits Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Libertad y Progreso company nor American Benefits Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Benefits Council company nor Libertad y Progreso company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Benefits Council nor Libertad y Progreso holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Benefits Council company nor Libertad y Progreso company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Libertad y Progreso company employs more people globally than American Benefits Council company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither American Benefits Council nor Libertad y Progreso holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Benefits Council nor Libertad y Progreso holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Benefits Council nor Libertad y Progreso holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Benefits Council nor Libertad y Progreso holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Benefits Council nor Libertad y Progreso holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Benefits Council nor Libertad y Progreso holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H