Comparison Overview

Bene

VS

"Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture

Bene

Schwarzwiesenstraße 3, Waidhofen/Ybbs, 3340, AT
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Bene is an internationally leading company that specialises in the design and furnishing of office and work environments. Bene defines the office as a living space and its concepts, products and services turn this philosophy into reality. This brings together a 225-year tradition of quality with innovation and award-winning design. The Bene Group is a globally active group of companies listed on the Vienna Exchange, with its head office and production facilities in Waidhofen an der Ybbs, Austria, with a presence in over 40 countries. As an integrated provider, Bene implements forward-thinking office designs, thereby contributing to the business success of its customers.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 586
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

"Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture

1269 Veterans Blvd, Redwood City, CA, 94063, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We specialize in offering affordable, real wood furniture, often with a wide choice of style, size and color to suit your tastes and needs. Our huge showroom in Redwood City, California offers thousands of items you can purchase as you see them, or you can choose your style, wood, color and we’ll build it for you at a affordable price. We also offer custom bookcases, custom office and custom upholstery. "Hoot"​ Judkins also specializes in custom executive, corporate and commercial furniture projects such as law offices, retail spaces, meeting centers, hotels, dormitories and camps.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bene.jpeg
Bene
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoot-judkins-furniture.jpeg
"Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bene
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
"Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bene in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture in 2025.

Incident History — Bene (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bene cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

"Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bene.jpeg
Bene
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hoot-judkins-furniture.jpeg
"Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bene company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bene company.

In the current year, "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company and Bene company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company nor Bene company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company nor Bene company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company nor Bene company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bene company nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bene nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bene company nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bene company employs more people globally than "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Bene nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bene nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bene nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bene nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bene nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bene nor "Hoot"​ Judkins Furniture holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.