Comparison Overview

Bend Health

VS

Eastway Behavioral Healthcare

Bend Health

Madison, 53705, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Bend Health, Inc. is a national provider of pediatric mental health for kids, teens, young adults, and their families. We believe whole family mental health starts with a strong foundation of resilience to cope with whatever life blows your way. Our peer-reviewed results demonstrate that more than 80% of members enrolled in Bend feel better within 60 to 90 days. We are revolutionizing the treatment of mental health conditions for kids and teens through a novel data-driven technology platform and evidence-based collaborative care model that enables the first scalable and integrated care solution in mental health. Through coaching, therapy and reduced time to evaluation and treatment by licensed pediatric psychiatry experts, our approach achieves better outcomes and results in happier, healthier kids and teens, while ensuring stigma, cost, and logistics are no longer barriers to care. Our founding team has been in both technology and healthcare for nearly twenty years, as individual contributors, and executives, in both private practices and at companies including Oracle, Optum, UnitedHealth Group and Teladoc Health.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 183
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eastway Behavioral Healthcare

600 Wayne Ave, Dayton, 45410, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Eastway Behavioral Healthcare is is the largest, private, not-for-profit provider of mental health, substance abuse, housing, residential, employment and educational services in the Miami Valley with additional services located in Washington Courthouse and Columbus, Ohio. Awards include; Dayton Top Workplace, The Alfred P. Sloan Award for Business Excellence in Workplace Flexibility, and the Psychologically Healthy Workplace Ohio Psychological Association's Award with National nominations.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 188
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bend-health.jpeg
Bend Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eastway-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Eastway Behavioral Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bend Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eastway Behavioral Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bend Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eastway Behavioral Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Bend Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bend Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eastway Behavioral Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eastway Behavioral Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bend-health.jpeg
Bend Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eastway-behavioral-healthcare.jpeg
Eastway Behavioral Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bend Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bend Health company.

In the current year, Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company and Bend Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company nor Bend Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company nor Bend Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company nor Bend Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bend Health company nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bend Health nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bend Health company nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Eastway Behavioral Healthcare company employs more people globally than Bend Health company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Bend Health nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bend Health nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bend Health nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bend Health nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bend Health nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bend Health nor Eastway Behavioral Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H