Comparison Overview

Benchmark Transitions

VS

Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc.

Benchmark Transitions

1971 Essex Ct., Redlands, 92373, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Benchmark Transitions is a residential and transitional living treatment program providing gender specific dual diagnosis treatment for young adult men. We also give continuing care to young adult men exiting other primary treatment centers and older adolescents aging-out of therapeutic boarding schools, wilderness and other programs. And we’re an ideal option for young adult children “stuck” at home, struggling to emerge into independence due to their co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Our program goes beyond the clinical treatment, behavioral health therapy, and addiction recovery of the typical residential treatment center. We also provide educational, vocational, and life skills support to help young adults obtain the necessary skills for life.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc.

788 South St, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, 01201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. (HEC) is a private nonprofit agency serving students from across the country. Hillcrest was started as an organization that provided residential treatment programs for students with complex psychiatric, behavioral and/or developmental disorders, including autism, and a variety of high risk behaviors. Today Hillcrest also offers a nonresidential day program, providing comprehensive educational and clinical behavior support services to children and adolescents with autism and/or social-emotional challenges. The programs and services at HEC are state licensed and certified, and the agency is accredited in behavioral health care by the Joint Commission.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 258
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benchmark-transitions.jpeg
Benchmark Transitions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hillcrest-educational-centers.jpeg
Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Benchmark Transitions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Benchmark Transitions in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Benchmark Transitions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Benchmark Transitions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benchmark-transitions.jpeg
Benchmark Transitions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hillcrest-educational-centers.jpeg
Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Benchmark Transitions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Benchmark Transitions company.

In the current year, Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company and Benchmark Transitions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company nor Benchmark Transitions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company nor Benchmark Transitions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company nor Benchmark Transitions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Benchmark Transitions company nor Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Benchmark Transitions nor Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Benchmark Transitions company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company.

Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. company employs more people globally than Benchmark Transitions company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Benchmark Transitions nor Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Benchmark Transitions nor Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Benchmark Transitions nor Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Benchmark Transitions nor Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Benchmark Transitions nor Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Benchmark Transitions nor Hillcrest Educational Centers, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N