Comparison Overview

Ben Sherman

VS

VF Corporation

Ben Sherman

Granary Building 1 Canal Wharf Leeds, Yorkshire LS11 5BB, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Ben Sherman transformed the humble shirt from a staple item into a statement piece that was perfect for the mood of the early 1960s and an instant success. Inspired by a modernist sartorial approach, this intrinsically British sub-culture embraced the Ben Sherman shirt, loving it for its high quality fabrication, slim-fitting style and unique design. Throughout the decades, one thing has remained a constant focus for the Ben Sherman shirt, the shirt is always worn buttoned up. It is a deliberate choice, that exudes Britishness and personal pride.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 501-1,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VF Corporation

VF Corporation, None, Denver, CO, US, 80202
Last Update: 2025-08-04 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

VF Corporation is one of the worldโ€™s largest apparel, footwear and accessories companies connecting people to the lifestyles, activities and experiences they cherish most through a family of iconic outdoor, active and workwear brands including Vansยฎ, The North Faceยฎ, Timberlandยฎ and Dickiesยฎ. Our purpose is to power movements of sustainable and active lifestyles for the betterment of people and our planet. We believe that when you discover the difference between a career and a calling, you get so much more out of life. When those lines begin to blur, you start to limit yourself much less and start aiming for more. Thatโ€™s what we want for everyone who joins us at VF. And frankly, thatโ€™s what it takes to thrive here too. For more information, please visit vfc.com.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 30,947
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ben-sherman.jpeg
Ben Sherman
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Ben Sherman
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VF Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ben Sherman in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

VF Corporation has 322.54% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Ben Sherman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ben Sherman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” VF Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VF Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ben-sherman.jpeg
Ben Sherman
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Ben Sherman company and VF Corporation company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

VF Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ben Sherman company has not reported any.

In the current year, VF Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than Ben Sherman company.

Neither VF Corporation company nor Ben Sherman company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

VF Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Ben Sherman company has not reported such incidents publicly.

VF Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Ben Sherman company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ben Sherman company nor VF Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ben Sherman company nor VF Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

VF Corporation company employs more people globally than Ben Sherman company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Apparel and Fashion.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X