Comparison Overview

Ben Sherman

VS

Russell Athletic

Ben Sherman

Granary Building 1 Canal Wharf Leeds, Yorkshire LS11 5BB, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Ben Sherman transformed the humble shirt from a staple item into a statement piece that was perfect for the mood of the early 1960s and an instant success. Inspired by a modernist sartorial approach, this intrinsically British sub-culture embraced the Ben Sherman shirt, loving it for its high quality fabrication, slim-fitting style and unique design. Throughout the decades, one thing has remained a constant focus for the Ben Sherman shirt, the shirt is always worn buttoned up. It is a deliberate choice, that exudes Britishness and personal pride.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 501-1,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Russell Athletic

Bowling Green, KY, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

From its beginnings in 1902, Russell Athletic has prided itself on the quality and value of its productsโ€”and on its commitment to its employees and the communities where it operates. Today, our heritage continues to inspire creativity and innovation on and off the field. For every artist, athlete, designer or creator who is striving to reach their potential and accomplish their goals, Russell Athletic is committed to supporting and celebrating their journey along the way. Welcome to the Athletic Life. Russell Athletic is a Fruit of the Loom, Inc. company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ben-sherman.jpeg
Ben Sherman
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russell-athletic.jpeg
Russell Athletic
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Ben Sherman
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Russell Athletic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ben Sherman in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Russell Athletic in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Ben Sherman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ben Sherman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Russell Athletic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Russell Athletic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ben-sherman.jpeg
Ben Sherman
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/russell-athletic.jpeg
Russell Athletic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ben Sherman company and Russell Athletic company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Russell Athletic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ben Sherman company.

In the current year, Russell Athletic company and Ben Sherman company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Russell Athletic company nor Ben Sherman company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Russell Athletic company nor Ben Sherman company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Russell Athletic company nor Ben Sherman company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ben Sherman company nor Russell Athletic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Russell Athletic company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ben Sherman company.

Neither Ben Sherman company nor Russell Athletic company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X