Comparison Overview

Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys

VS

ARL Lawyers

Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys

8 Menachem Plaut St., Rehovot, undefined, 76706, IL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Ben-Ami & Associates has a team of Patent Attorneys and technical advisors that can handle and provide advice on intellectual property matters in most technological areas, particularly in all fields of Life Sciences and Chemistry including, among others, inventions in the pharmaceutical, chemistry, organic chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology, nanotechnology, material chemistry, diagnostics, cosmetics, agricultural and veterinary areas, as well as in a variety of High-Tech fields, such as Telecommunications, Computer software, Computer hardware, Electronics, Electro optics, Internet-related applications, Business Methods, Medical devices ,and many other areas. Among our clients are leading universities, academic institutions and biotech companies as well as small and mid-size companies and independent inventors. We take the time to get to know you and your business better, to understand the real nature of your invention, and how you intend to exploit / commercialize it. This is important to devise a good patent strategy.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ARL Lawyers

19 Cornwall St, Lower Hutt, Wellington Region, 5010, NZ
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

ARL Lawyers are about making it happen. We are a general law practice, providing quality legal services for every situation that affects people, their families and their businesses. We are based in the Hutt Valley and cover the greater Wellington Region. We are committed to removing barriers to understanding the law by using plain English, demystifying legal processes and offering pragmatic solutions. We work on the principle that every client is unique and deserves respect. Matters that concern our clients are important to us.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ben-ami-&-associates.jpeg
Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arl-lawyers.jpeg
ARL Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ARL Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ARL Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ARL Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ARL Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ben-ami-&-associates.jpeg
Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arl-lawyers.jpeg
ARL Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ARL Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ARL Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company.

In the current year, ARL Lawyers company and Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ARL Lawyers company nor Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ARL Lawyers company nor Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ARL Lawyers company nor Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company nor ARL Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys nor ARL Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company nor ARL Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys company employs more people globally than ARL Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys nor ARL Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys nor ARL Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys nor ARL Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys nor ARL Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys nor ARL Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Paulina Ben-Ami, Patent Attorneys nor ARL Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X