Comparison Overview

Bem Promotora

VS

Sparkasse

Bem Promotora

Rua Siqueira Campos, 1163, Porto Alegre, RS, 90010001, BR
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)

Strong

A Bem Promotora é especializada em crédito consignado para funcionários públicos federais SIAPE e aposentados e pensionistas do INSS. Além disso, a empresa trabalha com Saque Bem Antecipado FGTS e uma variada oferta de seguros. A atuação baseia-se em canais próprios e parceiros, sempre fundamentada em princípios como agilidade, bem-estar, ética e eficiência. Fundada em 2008 em Porto Alegre, a Bem Promotora já se consolidou entre os principais players do mercado brasileiro. A presença em todas as regiões do país acontece por meio de lojas próprias e de uma qualificada rede de correspondentes substabelecidos. Aos parceiros e clientes, a Bem Promotora oferece atendimento qualificado, taxas competitivas, plataforma de negócios Bem Web, segurança no processo de averbação, retorno de saldos dentro do prazo, transparência nos relatórios e uma equipe de suporte sempre pronta para entrar em ação. Buscamos sempre trabalhar para fazer da experiência dos colaboradores e clientes a melhor possível. Somos um time vencedor e com vontade de apoiar nossos públicos a realizarem seus sonhos. A Bem é uma empresa GPTW! Estamos entre as melhores empresas para trabalhar no RS e RJ e entre as melhores para mulheres trabalhar no Brasil. Acreditamos que a diversidade é a chave para a inovação e a transformação. Aqui, todos são bem-vindos para somar!

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 428
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sparkasse

Berlin, DE
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Sparkassen: Nah, präsent und persönlich Als verlässliche Hausbank stehen wir immer und überall an der Seite unserer Kund:innen und Mitarbeitenden. Mit den Sparkassen können Sie auf exzellente Beratung und einen echten Finanzverbund zählen, der nicht nur Ihre persönlichen Finanzen, sondern auch die finanziellen Belange des Unternehmens berücksichtigt. Ob im Tagesgeschäft, bei großen Investitionsvorhaben oder bei der erfolgreichen Abwicklung von In- und Auslandsgeschäften: Wir schaffen Lösungen für den Unternehmenserfolg und unterstützen als verlässliche Arbeitgeberin unsere Mitarbeitenden.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bempromotora.jpeg
Bem Promotora
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sparkasse.jpeg
Sparkasse
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Bem Promotora
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sparkasse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bem Promotora in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sparkasse in 2025.

Incident History — Bem Promotora (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bem Promotora cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sparkasse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sparkasse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bempromotora.jpeg
Bem Promotora
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sparkasse.jpeg
Sparkasse
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Bem Promotora company and Sparkasse company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Sparkasse company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bem Promotora company.

In the current year, Sparkasse company and Bem Promotora company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sparkasse company nor Bem Promotora company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sparkasse company nor Bem Promotora company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sparkasse company nor Bem Promotora company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bem Promotora company nor Sparkasse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bem Promotora company nor Sparkasse company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bem Promotora company employs more people globally than Sparkasse company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in LaChatterie Verger up to 1.2.10. This impacts the function redirectToAuthorization of the file /src/main/services/mcp/oauth/provider.ts. The manipulation of the argument URL results in deserialization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeriaWei ZKEACMS up to 4.3. This affects the function Delete of the file src/ZKEACMS.Redirection/Controllers/UrlRedirectionController.cs of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: fix invalid free of JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap in diUnmount syzbot found an invalid-free in diUnmount: BUG: KASAN: double-free in slab_free mm/slub.c:3661 [inline] BUG: KASAN: double-free in __kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x110 mm/slub.c:3674 Free of addr ffff88806f410000 by task syz-executor131/3632 CPU: 0 PID: 3632 Comm: syz-executor131 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc7-syzkaller-00012-gca57f02295f1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1b1/0x28e lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description+0x74/0x340 mm/kasan/report.c:284 print_report+0x107/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:395 kasan_report_invalid_free+0xac/0xd0 mm/kasan/report.c:460 ____kasan_slab_free+0xfb/0x120 kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:177 [inline] slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1724 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x12e/0x1a0 mm/slub.c:1750 slab_free mm/slub.c:3661 [inline] __kmem_cache_free+0x71/0x110 mm/slub.c:3674 diUnmount+0xef/0x100 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:195 jfs_umount+0x108/0x370 fs/jfs/jfs_umount.c:63 jfs_put_super+0x86/0x190 fs/jfs/super.c:194 generic_shutdown_super+0x130/0x310 fs/super.c:492 kill_block_super+0x79/0xd0 fs/super.c:1428 deactivate_locked_super+0xa7/0xf0 fs/super.c:332 cleanup_mnt+0x494/0x520 fs/namespace.c:1186 task_work_run+0x243/0x300 kernel/task_work.c:179 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x664/0x2070 kernel/exit.c:820 do_group_exit+0x1fd/0x2b0 kernel/exit.c:950 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:961 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:959 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3b/0x40 kernel/exit.c:959 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [...] JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap is not setting to NULL after free in diUnmount. If jfs_remount() free JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap but then failed at diMount(). JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap will be freed once again. Fix this problem by setting JFS_IP(ipimap)->i_imap to NULL after free.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: qla2xxx: Fix deletion race condition System crash when using debug kernel due to link list corruption. The cause of the link list corruption is due to session deletion was allowed to queue up twice. Here's the internal trace that show the same port was allowed to double queue for deletion on different cpu. 20808683956 015 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 20808683957 027 qla2xxx [0000:13:00.1]-e801:4: Scheduling sess ffff93ebf9306800 for deletion 50:06:0e:80:12:48:ff:50 fc4_type 1 Move the clearing/setting of deleted flag lock.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/ksm: fix race with VMA iteration and mm_struct teardown exit_mmap() will tear down the VMAs and maple tree with the mmap_lock held in write mode. Ensure that the maple tree is still valid by checking ksm_test_exit() after taking the mmap_lock in read mode, but before the for_each_vma() iterator dereferences a destroyed maple tree. Since the maple tree is destroyed, the flags telling lockdep to check an external lock has been cleared. Skip the for_each_vma() iterator to avoid dereferencing a maple tree without the external lock flag, which would create a lockdep warning.