Comparison Overview

Belmark inc

VS

Mutual Engraving and Printing Company

Belmark inc

600 Heritage Rd, De Pere, WI, 54115, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Belmark, we manufacture pressure-sensitive labels, flexible packaging and folding cartons for a broad range of industries. We partner with our customers to help them create incredible packaging, save money and gain a competitive edge in the market. We’re a tight-knit, hardworking team of over 1,000 strong. And we’re dedicated to bringing our customers the creativity, energy and problem-solving to help build their brands through innovative packaging solutions. We’re built on values. Committed to our customers. And always pushing ourselves — and the packaging industry — forward. Bruce Bell founded Belmark in 1977 with a focus on quality, efficiency and true customer partnerships. He instilled characteristics of organization, value, cleanliness and friendliness — values that drive our culture and company to this day. Since then, we’ve grown at four times the industry average, and helped countless customers grow along with us. www.belmark.com Follow us on: facebook.com/belmarkinc instagram.com/belmarkinc

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 554
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mutual Engraving and Printing Company

511 Hempstead Ave, West Hempstead, 11552, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Mutual Engraving is a full service print shop. We do genuine steel die engraving, embossing, thermography, offset printing, foil stamping and digital printing. we specialize in stationery, business cards, invitations and folders, but anything printed is within our realm. All work is done in house and customer service is our claim to fame. we offer a customized online ordering site.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belmark.jpeg
Belmark inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Mutual Engraving and Printing Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Belmark inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mutual Engraving and Printing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belmark inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mutual Engraving and Printing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Belmark inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belmark inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mutual Engraving and Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mutual Engraving and Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belmark.jpeg
Belmark inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Mutual Engraving and Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Belmark inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Belmark inc company.

In the current year, Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company and Belmark inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company nor Belmark inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company nor Belmark inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company nor Belmark inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Belmark inc company nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Belmark inc nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Belmark inc company nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Belmark inc company employs more people globally than Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Belmark inc nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N