Comparison Overview

Belmark inc

VS

Brightformat

Belmark inc

600 Heritage Rd, De Pere, WI, 54115, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Belmark, we manufacture pressure-sensitive labels, flexible packaging and folding cartons for a broad range of industries. We partner with our customers to help them create incredible packaging, save money and gain a competitive edge in the market. We’re a tight-knit, hardworking team of over 1,000 strong. And we’re dedicated to bringing our customers the creativity, energy and problem-solving to help build their brands through innovative packaging solutions. We’re built on values. Committed to our customers. And always pushing ourselves — and the packaging industry — forward. Bruce Bell founded Belmark in 1977 with a focus on quality, efficiency and true customer partnerships. He instilled characteristics of organization, value, cleanliness and friendliness — values that drive our culture and company to this day. Since then, we’ve grown at four times the industry average, and helped countless customers grow along with us. www.belmark.com Follow us on: facebook.com/belmarkinc instagram.com/belmarkinc

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 554
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brightformat

5300 Corporate Grove SE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49512, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Brightformat, we have taken the conventional model for a printing company and made it relevant in today's world. As specialized experts in high-quality digital printing and direct mail, we have built our business on the simple yet often overlooked belief that there is nothing more important than the success of our clients. We group our services into five categories: environmental graphics, event graphics, retail graphics, marketing materials, and direct mail. Those categories are helpful as a starting point, but the way we think about projects is a lot more flexible. We often find solutions others can’t by bringing techniques and ideas from one category to another—using all the tools at our disposal to bring projects to life. Our company is sharp, colorful, service-oriented, and forward-thinking in all things graphic arts. We work with superheroes, you should too. Thank you for joining us. Brightformat was founded originally in 1988 as Diversified Data Services by current co-owner Mike Glupker. It began as a company offering mailing list services to clients and has grown and evolved into a digital printing, direct mail and marketing firm with an excellent reputation for quality and service. Current wonder twins--and co-owners since 2008, Pete Houlihan and Mike Glupker recently changed the name to Brightformat because they wanted it to more accurately reflect their commitment to smart, colorful service and their passion for all things Graphic Arts.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belmark.jpeg
Belmark inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightformat.jpeg
Brightformat
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Belmark inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brightformat
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belmark inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brightformat in 2025.

Incident History — Belmark inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belmark inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brightformat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brightformat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belmark.jpeg
Belmark inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brightformat.jpeg
Brightformat
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Belmark inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Brightformat company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brightformat company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Belmark inc company.

In the current year, Brightformat company and Belmark inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brightformat company nor Belmark inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brightformat company nor Belmark inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brightformat company nor Belmark inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Belmark inc company nor Brightformat company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Belmark inc nor Brightformat holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Belmark inc company nor Brightformat company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Belmark inc company employs more people globally than Brightformat company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Belmark inc nor Brightformat holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Brightformat holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Brightformat holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Brightformat holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Brightformat holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Belmark inc nor Brightformat holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N