Comparison Overview

Belly Acres

VS

Flagship Press

Belly Acres

2946 N Western Ave, Chicago, 60618, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Belly Acres! For over 20 years we have built our reputation on consistent, high quality screen printing and excellent customer service. From standard ink to fashion soft ink, discharge ink, and foil, we have the tools and experience to deliver high quality results. A vast array of t-shirt brands and styles are currently available – all of the industry favorites and much more. Please follow the website link below to view our gallery and product catalog. We look forward to working with you on your next project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Flagship Press

150 Flagship Drive, North Andover, MA, US, 01845
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Flagship Press is a full service printer based in North Andover, MA. Printing up to 10 colors using UV inks allows for high intensity color on uncoated papers, and specialty coating techniques on coated papers. Full digital division with two 26"​ digital presses using dry matte ink technology. We are a G7 Master printer and are using 100% renewable energy to power our facility. A full in house bindery with mailing and fulfillment round out the most comprehensive facility in the northeast. Please visit our website for more information. www.flagshippress.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belly-acres.jpeg
Belly Acres
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flagship-press.jpeg
Flagship Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Belly Acres
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Flagship Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belly Acres in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flagship Press in 2025.

Incident History — Belly Acres (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belly Acres cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Flagship Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flagship Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belly-acres.jpeg
Belly Acres
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flagship-press.jpeg
Flagship Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Belly Acres company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Flagship Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Flagship Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Belly Acres company.

In the current year, Flagship Press company and Belly Acres company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Flagship Press company nor Belly Acres company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Flagship Press company nor Belly Acres company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Flagship Press company nor Belly Acres company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Belly Acres company nor Flagship Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Belly Acres nor Flagship Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Belly Acres company nor Flagship Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Flagship Press company employs more people globally than Belly Acres company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Belly Acres nor Flagship Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Belly Acres nor Flagship Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Belly Acres nor Flagship Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Belly Acres nor Flagship Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Belly Acres nor Flagship Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Belly Acres nor Flagship Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N