Comparison Overview

Bellia Print & Design

VS

Roman Marketing Group

Bellia Print & Design

1047 North Broad Street, Woodbury, New Jersey, 08096, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.belliaprinting.com

We are a family owned business supplying Printing, Copying, Graphic Design, and finishing services through our two locations covering Southern New Jersey and the Philadelphia region. Our business is great service! Our staff offers services to assist people in marketing their business or organization in the most cost efficient manner. A leader in providing state of the art reproduction services. Since our start in 1973 we have consistently offered premier service to our customers. We use the most up to date reproduction equipment and train our staff to assure a consistent product, on time and to specification. Our two locations are much more than copy centers. Through continued innovation and listening to our customers needs, we have expanded our capabilities to include high tech digital graphics and large format printing. Our award winning Graphic Design Team can assist you to develop marketing programs that will meet your budget and set your business apart from the crowd.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Roman Marketing Group

442 Main Street, West Springfield, Massachusetts, 01089, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.romanmarketing.group

Roman Marketing Group is a client service-based marketing firm providing pro-active, creative, and strategic solutions for your business. Our number one focus is to ensure a first-class level of service to all clients, by performing at the highest standard in marketing, web, graphic design and printing at all times. Providing a constant eye for detail and a focus on quality, while maintaining a level of customer service and impartial advice second to none, RMG exists to benefit your company’s bottom line.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bellia-print-&-design.jpeg
Bellia Print & Design
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roman-marketing-group.jpeg
Roman Marketing Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bellia Print & Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Roman Marketing Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bellia Print & Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roman Marketing Group in 2025.

Incident History — Bellia Print & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bellia Print & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Roman Marketing Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roman Marketing Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bellia-print-&-design.jpeg
Bellia Print & Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roman-marketing-group.jpeg
Roman Marketing Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Roman Marketing Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bellia Print & Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Roman Marketing Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bellia Print & Design company.

In the current year, Roman Marketing Group company and Bellia Print & Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Roman Marketing Group company nor Bellia Print & Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Roman Marketing Group company nor Bellia Print & Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Roman Marketing Group company nor Bellia Print & Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bellia Print & Design company nor Roman Marketing Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bellia Print & Design nor Roman Marketing Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bellia Print & Design company nor Roman Marketing Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bellia Print & Design company employs more people globally than Roman Marketing Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Bellia Print & Design nor Roman Marketing Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bellia Print & Design nor Roman Marketing Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bellia Print & Design nor Roman Marketing Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bellia Print & Design nor Roman Marketing Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bellia Print & Design nor Roman Marketing Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bellia Print & Design nor Roman Marketing Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References