Comparison Overview

Bella Casa

VS

QFC Ltd

Bella Casa

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Bella Casa is a destination home furnishings and decor showroom for 17 years in Portland, Oregon's hip Pearl District. Serving customers from Washington, Oregon, Idaho and California and tourists beyond our interior designers will help you define your interior home design style or act as your personal shopper. Whether you desire a single piece of furniture or accessory for your home or need assistance with creating a new home from your new house, we have a large selection of transitional, contemporary and traditional furniture and home decor. Additionally we offer custom upholstery and have many lamps & lighting fixtures, rugs and art objects. Bella Casa's 10,000 sq ft layered showroom is an Award winning merchandising experience for all perfectly suited for interior designers and customers to browse the latest products from international markets. Take it home today from the showroom floor or order custom. Merchandise is ever-changing so it is wise to stop in frequently.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

QFC Ltd

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

At QFC we’ve been designing and manufacturing upholstered furniture since 1993 in Grantham, Lincolnshire. We now make over 250,000 sofas a year for major retailers, including DFS, Next, Argos, Laura Ashley, John Lewis and Made. We have a passion for product design and demonstrate our product leadership through our understanding of design trends and our extensive research on consumer buying behaviour. At QFC our culture is to constantly question the status quo and look for better ways of doing things. All areas of our business are aligned to our brand purpose which is to make ‘Sofas to be proud of’. To find out more visit our website www.qfc.co.uk or follow us on Instagram @qfcsofas

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bella-casa.jpeg
Bella Casa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qfc-ltd.jpeg
QFC Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bella Casa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
QFC Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bella Casa in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QFC Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Bella Casa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bella Casa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — QFC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QFC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bella-casa.jpeg
Bella Casa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qfc-ltd.jpeg
QFC Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

QFC Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bella Casa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, QFC Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bella Casa company.

In the current year, QFC Ltd company and Bella Casa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither QFC Ltd company nor Bella Casa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither QFC Ltd company nor Bella Casa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither QFC Ltd company nor Bella Casa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bella Casa company nor QFC Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bella Casa nor QFC Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bella Casa company nor QFC Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

QFC Ltd company employs more people globally than Bella Casa company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Bella Casa nor QFC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bella Casa nor QFC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bella Casa nor QFC Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bella Casa nor QFC Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bella Casa nor QFC Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bella Casa nor QFC Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.