Comparison Overview

BELL-MARK

VS

GES

BELL-MARK

331 Changebridge Road, Pine Brook, NJ, 07058, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

For over 65 years, BELL-MARK has been developing innovative solutions for package and carton printing applications in the medical device, pharmaceutical, prepared foods, meat, bakery, dairy, and poultry packaging industries. BELL-MARK offers many in-line printing technologies including piezo inkjet, thermal inkjet, thermal transfer, flexographic, and ink coder, all of which satisfy requirements to print directly onto package and carton substrates.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GES

Suite # 218, 2nd Floor, Clifton Broadway Building, 13-FT-4, Khayaban-e-Iqbal, Bath Island, Main Clifton, Karachi, Sindh, undefined, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to the hub of solutions, where you can experience Global Engineering Services (GES) diversified portfolio to meet your needs. We at GES do not sell products we provide custom made solutions based on your specific requirements. GES Professionals ultimate mission is to understand your query, recognize your need, provide efficient solution and effectively address your problem for Engineering/Industrial sector. You are at the right venue, if you are seeking quality driven services to facilitate your needs. Company Overview: GES is a diversified hub to provide solutions for Engineering/Industrial sector. A hybrid class firm devised to accommodate its services in the fields of Automation, Metal & Spares- Development, and Technical Support and also entertain in the field of visual communication.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6,571
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bell-mark-corp..jpeg
BELL-MARK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ges.jpeg
GES
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BELL-MARK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GES
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BELL-MARK in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GES in 2025.

Incident History — BELL-MARK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BELL-MARK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GES (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GES cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bell-mark-corp..jpeg
BELL-MARK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ges.jpeg
GES
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GES company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BELL-MARK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GES company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BELL-MARK company.

In the current year, GES company and BELL-MARK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GES company nor BELL-MARK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GES company nor BELL-MARK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GES company nor BELL-MARK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BELL-MARK company nor GES company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BELL-MARK nor GES holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BELL-MARK company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GES company.

GES company employs more people globally than BELL-MARK company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither BELL-MARK nor GES holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BELL-MARK nor GES holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BELL-MARK nor GES holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BELL-MARK nor GES holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BELL-MARK nor GES holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BELL-MARK nor GES holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H