Comparison Overview

Belk

VS

Landmark Group

Belk

2801 W Tyvola Rd, Charlotte, 28217, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Charlotte-based Belk, Inc., a privately-owned department store, began when William Henry Belk opened his first store in 1888 with his brother, Dr. John Belk, joining as a partner. What started as two brothers in business has now grown into a legacy of selling great products at great prices, treating customers like family, and giving back to the community. Throughout the years, we’ve changed and grown in so many ways. We’ve added exciting products, adapted the way we work, and made it easier to shop with new technology and services. Today, Belk serves customers at nearly 300 Belk stores in 16 Southeastern states, at belk.com, and through the mobile app.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,732
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Landmark Group

Dubai, AE
Last Update: 2026-01-18

For over five decades, Landmark Group has shaped the region’s retail and hospitality landscape-growing from a single store in Bahrain to one of the largest and most successful omnichannel and hospitality groups across the Middle East, Asia and Africa. Rooted in purpose and powered by innovation, we bring together 21 trusted brands — including own brands like Centrepoint, Max, Home Centre, Babyshop, Splash, Shoemart, Lifestyle, VIVA, Citymax and more- spanning fashion, home, fitness, and hospitality. With over 2,500 stores across 15 countries, we live our purpose every day: creating exceptional value for all the lives we touch. Driven by a customer-first philosophy, we place strong emphasis on enriching every interaction. Through our portfolio of loyalty programmes, Shukran and Landmark Rewards, we connect with over 35 million active members, offering exclusive rewards and meaningful experiences across our brands and partners. At Landmark, we believe our greatest strength lies in our people. Our success is powered by talented and passionate Landmarkers who bring diverse perspectives, creativity, and expertise to everything they do. With over 53,000 employees from almost 100 nationalities, we continue to build a culture of growth, innovation, and shared purpose, living the group's values collectively of listening, empowering, adapting and delivering with integrity.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 30,749
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belk.jpeg
Belk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-group.jpeg
Landmark Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Belk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Landmark Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belk in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Landmark Group in 2026.

Incident History — Belk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Landmark Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Landmark Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belk.jpeg
Belk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmark-group.jpeg
Landmark Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Landmark Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Belk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Landmark Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Belk company.

In the current year, Landmark Group company and Belk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Landmark Group company nor Belk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Landmark Group company nor Belk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Landmark Group company nor Belk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Belk company nor Landmark Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Belk nor Landmark Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Landmark Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Belk company.

Landmark Group company employs more people globally than Belk company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Belk nor Landmark Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Belk nor Landmark Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Belk nor Landmark Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Belk nor Landmark Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Belk nor Landmark Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Belk nor Landmark Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.