Comparison Overview

Believe in Scotland

VS

Adjacency Partners

Believe in Scotland

290 Bath Street, 3rd floor, Suite 1A, None, Glasgow, None, GB, G2 4JR
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Believe in Scotland is the largest, most active and most professional Scottish independence campaigning organisation and was named the 2020 Scottish independence campaign of the year. We Believe in Scotland and we want you to feel the same way. Ahead of the 2014 referendum support for independence rose from 27% to 45%, but sadly it wasn’t enough. We were the 45% and now, with another independence referendum coming, we are preparing to win Scotland’s independence and begin the work of building a new and better independent nation. This page is part of the Business for Scotland / Believe in Scotland family of Yes pages, we will soon bring them all together to campaign for Scotland’s independence. Don't hate the media, become the media #BelieveinScotland

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Adjacency Partners

107 SE Washington St., Portland, Oregon, 97214, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

WE BUILD BRIDGES. We sit at the intersection of ideas, opportunities, and relationships. At Adjacency Partners it's about people, trust, collaboration, teams, experimenting with ideas, and growing our partner's business, together. When an ecosystem thrives, it means that the people have developed patterns of behavior – or culture – that streamline the flow of ideas, talent, and capital. That's tomorrow's advisory at the purest level. That's what we push ourselves to be.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/believeinscotland.jpeg
Believe in Scotland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adjacencypartners.jpeg
Adjacency Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Believe in Scotland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Adjacency Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Believe in Scotland in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adjacency Partners in 2025.

Incident History — Believe in Scotland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Believe in Scotland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Adjacency Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adjacency Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/believeinscotland.jpeg
Believe in Scotland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adjacencypartners.jpeg
Adjacency Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Believe in Scotland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Adjacency Partners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Adjacency Partners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Believe in Scotland company.

In the current year, Adjacency Partners company and Believe in Scotland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Adjacency Partners company nor Believe in Scotland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Adjacency Partners company nor Believe in Scotland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Adjacency Partners company nor Believe in Scotland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Believe in Scotland company nor Adjacency Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Believe in Scotland nor Adjacency Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Believe in Scotland company nor Adjacency Partners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Believe in Scotland nor Adjacency Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Believe in Scotland nor Adjacency Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Believe in Scotland nor Adjacency Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Believe in Scotland nor Adjacency Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Believe in Scotland nor Adjacency Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Believe in Scotland nor Adjacency Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X