Comparison Overview

Being Single Magazine

VS

Edinburgh

Being Single Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Being Single Magazine , founded in 1982, began as a print publication. The mission of the magazine was to guide Singles in living their best life in their chosen lifestyle. Gaining worldwide acclaim over the years, we impacted the lives of tons of singles across the globe. We have recently made the complete switch from print to digital and hold tight to our purpose of providing the non-married with dating and lifestyle information to enhance and influence their lives and social decisions.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Edinburgh

Edinburgh, EH1, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Edinburgh Website aiming to become the leading and most interconnected business directory catering to the local community broke new ground by offering free business leads and directory listings to local travellers, students, businesses and locals. Edinburgh Website has been established to work with all the stakeholders in Edinburgh and developing a strong and successful trading environment to enable all businesses within the area to maximise their potential.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/being-single-magazine.jpeg
Being Single Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edinburgh.jpeg
Edinburgh
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Being Single Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Edinburgh
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Being Single Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edinburgh in 2025.

Incident History — Being Single Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Being Single Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Edinburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edinburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/being-single-magazine.jpeg
Being Single Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edinburgh.jpeg
Edinburgh
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Being Single Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Edinburgh company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Edinburgh company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Being Single Magazine company.

In the current year, Edinburgh company and Being Single Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Edinburgh company nor Being Single Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Edinburgh company nor Being Single Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Edinburgh company nor Being Single Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Being Single Magazine company nor Edinburgh company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Being Single Magazine nor Edinburgh holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Being Single Magazine company nor Edinburgh company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Being Single Magazine nor Edinburgh holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Being Single Magazine nor Edinburgh holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Being Single Magazine nor Edinburgh holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Being Single Magazine nor Edinburgh holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Being Single Magazine nor Edinburgh holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Being Single Magazine nor Edinburgh holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.