Comparison Overview

Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS)

VS

Southlake Counseling Center

Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS)

12600 W Colfax Ave, Suite B-410, Lakewood, Colorado, US, 80215
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Behavioral Treatment Services was founded in March of 2014, after working as Intervention Clinical Services for almost 10 years. In January 2015, BTS acquired the Center for Change in Boulder and Longmont. BTS is an OBH (Office of Behavioral Health) licensed agency. BTS was founded to provide quality clinical services to the criminal justice community. BTS primarily hires Master’s level clinicians with specific training in addictions, mental health, and criminal justice issues. With over 50 staff, BTS provides a range of clinical services to the community. We strive to challenge and engage our clients to examine behaviors, beliefs, thoughts, and emotions in order to effect desired change. Our mission statement is: Providing accessible, integrated, and inclusive behavioral health services supporting clients throughout the criminal justice system.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Southlake Counseling Center

903 Northeast Drive, Davidson, 28036, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Southlake Counseling Center is the premiere counseling, coaching and invention firm of the Carolinas. Southlake has a team of expertly trained psychotherapists, coaches, nutritionists and wellness professionals that will help guide you to success in any area of your personal or business development. We’re a full-service team of highly certified health professionals that exist to help remove the barriers in the way of living life to its full potential. We’re an inclusive practice where everyone is welcome, treating a wide array of issues related to mental health. So, if you are ready for a breakthrough and want to reach your full potential, please reach out to us today at www.southlakecounseling.com. Live Happy, Love Deeper, Start NOW!

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/behavioral-treatment-services.jpeg
Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southlake-counseling-and-consulting.jpeg
Southlake Counseling Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Southlake Counseling Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southlake Counseling Center in 2026.

Incident History — Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Southlake Counseling Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southlake Counseling Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/behavioral-treatment-services.jpeg
Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southlake-counseling-and-consulting.jpeg
Southlake Counseling Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company and Southlake Counseling Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Southlake Counseling Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company.

In the current year, Southlake Counseling Center company and Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Southlake Counseling Center company nor Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Southlake Counseling Center company nor Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Southlake Counseling Center company nor Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company nor Southlake Counseling Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) nor Southlake Counseling Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company nor Southlake Counseling Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Southlake Counseling Center company employs more people globally than Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) nor Southlake Counseling Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) nor Southlake Counseling Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) nor Southlake Counseling Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) nor Southlake Counseling Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) nor Southlake Counseling Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Behavioral Treatment Services (BTS) nor Southlake Counseling Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N