Comparison Overview

Behavioral Health Allies

VS

Pacific Grove Hospital

Behavioral Health Allies

10300 Hickman Mills Dr, Kansas City, 64137, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

At Behavioral Health Allies, we provide an evolving system of care that offers a lifetime of hope for individuals with developmental disabilities and complex behavioral needs, including Autism. For all ages and stages of life, our full continuum of services connects people to new opportunities to grow, learn, and live. Pairing data-driven methods with compassionate care, our multidisciplinary team includes Board-Certified Behavior Analysts, Special Education Teachers, registered behavior technicians, direct support professionals, speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, and more. From early intervention and education to community living, we bring together social, language, and life skills through Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapies, along with positive behavioral intervention and supports – and we customize our approach to each individual’s needs. Because we have a reputation for unparalleled care and expertise, we have become the trusted resource for our network of regional and national partners who refer families from across the country to us. Visit us at behavioralhealth.org to learn more.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pacific Grove Hospital

5900 Brockton Ave, Riverside, 92506, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Pacific Grove Hospital is a 68-bed, acute psychiatric and chemical dependency hospital situated on 4.5 acres in the heart of Riverside, Calif. Our highly trained staff treats voluntary patients through the following programs: •Acute Psychiatric: Full-service care for adults suffering from mental health disorders such as anxiety and depression, bipolar disorders, disrupted sleep patterns, impulse behavior disorders, grief and loss management, personality disorders and general management of life’s stressors •Geriatric Psychiatric: Our Older Adult Unit provides specialized treatment for individuals age 65 and older who are struggling with depression or confusion, addiction to alcohol or medication, agitation or anxiety, and conditions associated with dementia. •Chemical Dependency Treatment: Comprehensive addiction treatment to help individuals overcome dependence on alcohol, prescription pain medications, nicotine or controlled substances such as amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine and opiates — including medically managed detoxification, psychological and psychiatric evaluations, rehabilitation, counseling, and 12-step recovery and continuing care programs •Outpatient Programs: Partial hospitalization and intensive outpatient programs meet every week, Monday through Friday, offering program tracks for psychiatric care, chemical dependency treatment and dual treatment for mental health and addiction. We also anticipate positive changes as we begin considering renovations and upgrades to Pacific Grove, and evaluate ways we may further develop and expand our services. I look forward to sharing more information with you in the months ahead.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/behavioral-health-allies.jpeg
Behavioral Health Allies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-grove-hospital.jpeg
Pacific Grove Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Behavioral Health Allies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pacific Grove Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Behavioral Health Allies in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Grove Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — Behavioral Health Allies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Behavioral Health Allies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pacific Grove Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Grove Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/behavioral-health-allies.jpeg
Behavioral Health Allies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-grove-hospital.jpeg
Pacific Grove Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pacific Grove Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Behavioral Health Allies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Pacific Grove Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Behavioral Health Allies company has not reported any.

In the current year, Pacific Grove Hospital company and Behavioral Health Allies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pacific Grove Hospital company nor Behavioral Health Allies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Pacific Grove Hospital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Behavioral Health Allies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pacific Grove Hospital company nor Behavioral Health Allies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Behavioral Health Allies company nor Pacific Grove Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Behavioral Health Allies nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pacific Grove Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Behavioral Health Allies company.

Pacific Grove Hospital company employs more people globally than Behavioral Health Allies company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Behavioral Health Allies nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Behavioral Health Allies nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Behavioral Health Allies nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Behavioral Health Allies nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Behavioral Health Allies nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Behavioral Health Allies nor Pacific Grove Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N