Comparison Overview

Beer Law Center

VS

ABA Center for Innovation

Beer Law Center

16 W Martin St, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Beer Law Center is a division of the Matheson Law Office PLLC, dedicated to meeting the needs of individuals and small businesses with a focus on craft beer and the craft beverage business. At Beer Law Center, we believe that the long term relationship and trust of our clients are more important than running up a bill. We feel that an attorney should be a partner for your business. As such, we try very hard to find new and innovative ways to save you money, including identifying work that you can do yourself rather than paying us to do it. We’re happy to be a process coach, a guide, or to complete it all for you – whatever role you need, we want to help. We want to see your business be successful and grow. Many of our brewery clients have started out at less than 50 barrels a year, but with the help of the Beer Law Center our clients have seen growth year after year.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ABA Center for Innovation

321 N Clark St, Chicago, Illinois, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Launched in 2016 at the recommendation of the ABA Commission on the Future of Legal Services, the ABA Center for Innovation is creating more accessible, efficient, and effective legal services in the United States and around the globe. We improve legal services through innovation, education, and collaboration. INNOVATE Through our Programs & Projects we pioneer new approaches to legal services. We also help drive change by hosting promising NextGen and Innovation fellows from around the nation. COLLABORATE We collaborate to identify, encourage, and accelerate innovations that improve access to quality legal services. EDUCATE We train lawyers, judges, academics, and the public about innovative legal services delivery.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beer-law-center.jpeg
Beer Law Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aba-center-for-innovation.jpeg
ABA Center for Innovation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beer Law Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABA Center for Innovation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beer Law Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABA Center for Innovation in 2025.

Incident History — Beer Law Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beer Law Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABA Center for Innovation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABA Center for Innovation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beer-law-center.jpeg
Beer Law Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aba-center-for-innovation.jpeg
ABA Center for Innovation
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ABA Center for Innovation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Beer Law Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ABA Center for Innovation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Beer Law Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, ABA Center for Innovation company and Beer Law Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABA Center for Innovation company nor Beer Law Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ABA Center for Innovation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Beer Law Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ABA Center for Innovation company nor Beer Law Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beer Law Center company nor ABA Center for Innovation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beer Law Center nor ABA Center for Innovation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ABA Center for Innovation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Beer Law Center company.

Neither Beer Law Center nor ABA Center for Innovation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beer Law Center nor ABA Center for Innovation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beer Law Center nor ABA Center for Innovation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beer Law Center nor ABA Center for Innovation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beer Law Center nor ABA Center for Innovation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beer Law Center nor ABA Center for Innovation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X