Comparison Overview

Beef Farmers of Ontario

VS

Pennsylvania Forest Products Association

Beef Farmers of Ontario

130 Malcolm Road, Guelph, Ontario, CA, N1K 1B1
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ontariobeef.com/

For over sixty years, the Beef Farmers of Ontario (BFO) has been a tough and credible advocate and unified voice for the province’s 19,000 beef farmers, representing all sectors of the industry. On behalf of its members, BFO advocates in the areas of sustainability, animal health and care, environment, food safety, and domestic and export market development. BFO’s mission is to foster a sustainable and profitable beef industry, and have Ontario beef recognized as an outstanding product by consumers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pennsylvania Forest Products Association

212 N 3rd St, Suite 2023, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, US, 17101
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://paforestproducts.org

PA's statewide advocacy organization for all sectors of the forest products industry, leading changes in state/local government policy and public perception that will enhance the bottom-line competitiveness, profitability and growth of its member companies. Our mission is to promote the common interests of the forest products industry within Pennsylvania by: -Creating a regulatory environment in Pennsylvania that enhances the profitability of the entire forest products industry; -Creating among the general public an increased knowledge of, and appreciation for, the value of the forest products industry in Pennsylvania, and the contributions the industry makes to forest sustainability; and -Increasing the amount of information available to the industry about legislative and regulatory issues, technical matters and activities within the industry,

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beef-farmers-of-ontario.jpeg
Beef Farmers of Ontario
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pennsylvania-forest-products-association.jpeg
Pennsylvania Forest Products Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beef Farmers of Ontario
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pennsylvania Forest Products Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beef Farmers of Ontario in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pennsylvania Forest Products Association in 2025.

Incident History — Beef Farmers of Ontario (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beef Farmers of Ontario cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pennsylvania Forest Products Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pennsylvania Forest Products Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beef-farmers-of-ontario.jpeg
Beef Farmers of Ontario
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pennsylvania-forest-products-association.jpeg
Pennsylvania Forest Products Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Beef Farmers of Ontario company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Beef Farmers of Ontario company.

In the current year, Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company and Beef Farmers of Ontario company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company nor Beef Farmers of Ontario company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company nor Beef Farmers of Ontario company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company nor Beef Farmers of Ontario company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario company nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario company nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Beef Farmers of Ontario company employs more people globally than Pennsylvania Forest Products Association company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beef Farmers of Ontario nor Pennsylvania Forest Products Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References