Comparison Overview

Beech Brook

VS

Clearview Treatment Programs

Beech Brook

13201 Granger Rd, Cleveland, Ohio, 44125, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At Beech Brook, we believe all children deserve the chance to grow up in safe and healthy families with the support they need to reach their full potential. Since 1852, that’s been our guiding principle at Beech Brook. Our work has changed as the times and needs of families have changed but that belief remains at the heart of our mission. Today, as a leading behavioral health agency, we touch more than 14,000 lives each year in Northeast Ohio, bringing healing to troubled children, strengthening and supporting parents, and planting the seeds of hope for a brighter future. Beech Brook provides a wide range of programs ranging from child abuse prevention, education and early intervention to community and home-based treatment programs for at-risk children and families. Please visit our website to learn more! Beech Brook provides a wide range of programs ranging from child abuse prevention, education and early intervention to community and home-based treatment programs for at-risk children and families.  Community & Home-Based  Comprehensive Sex Education  Divorce Education Seminar  Early Childhood  Family Center  Foster Care  Outpatient Counseling

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 238
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clearview Treatment Programs

911 Coeur D'Alene Ave., Venice Beach, 90291, US
Last Update:

Clearview Treatment Programs, started in 2000, operates multiple treatment centers in the Southern California beach communities and the Los Angeles area. Clearview uniquely offers a full continuum of care, including residential treatment, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient levels of care. Clearview Center for Addictions and Mental Health Disorders Clearview Center for Addictions and Mental Health Disorders is a dual-diagnosis treatment center that provides individualized treatment for men and women. At Clearview, we aim to treat the underlying issues, not just the symptoms, using the most current evidence-based treatments available, including Dialectical Behavior Therapy. Clearview Women's Center for Borderline Personality and Emotional Disorders Clearview Women's Center for Borderline Personality and Emotional Disorders is a comprehensive Dialectical Behavior Therapy treatment center. Clearview Women’s Center was created specifically to treat women who struggle with BPD symptoms and emotional dysregulation and is one of the only programs of its kind in the country, offering residential treatment and day treatment options so you can get the treatment that works best for you. Clearview Outpatient Treatment Centers: https://clearviewoutpatient.com Clearview’s Outpatient Treatment Centers in Los Angeles, Pasadena, and Woodland Hills, Calif., specialize in treating adults (ages 18+) with complex mental health conditions, substance use disorders, or a dual diagnosis. Programming is offered at the partial hospitalization and intensive outpatient levels of care.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beech-brook.jpeg
Beech Brook
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clearview-treatment-programs.jpeg
Clearview Treatment Programs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beech Brook
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clearview Treatment Programs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beech Brook in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clearview Treatment Programs in 2026.

Incident History — Beech Brook (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beech Brook cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clearview Treatment Programs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clearview Treatment Programs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beech-brook.jpeg
Beech Brook
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clearview-treatment-programs.jpeg
Clearview Treatment Programs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Beech Brook company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clearview Treatment Programs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Clearview Treatment Programs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Beech Brook company.

In the current year, Clearview Treatment Programs company and Beech Brook company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clearview Treatment Programs company nor Beech Brook company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Clearview Treatment Programs company nor Beech Brook company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Clearview Treatment Programs company nor Beech Brook company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beech Brook company nor Clearview Treatment Programs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beech Brook nor Clearview Treatment Programs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Beech Brook company nor Clearview Treatment Programs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Beech Brook company employs more people globally than Clearview Treatment Programs company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Beech Brook nor Clearview Treatment Programs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beech Brook nor Clearview Treatment Programs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beech Brook nor Clearview Treatment Programs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beech Brook nor Clearview Treatment Programs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beech Brook nor Clearview Treatment Programs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beech Brook nor Clearview Treatment Programs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N