Comparison Overview

Becket & Lee LLP

VS

Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm

Becket & Lee LLP

Malvern, 19355, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Becket & Lee LLP specializes in legal and administrative management of bankrupt accounts using a sophisticated technology-driven and cost-effective approach, while adhering to the highest standard of quality, security and ethics. The firm’s staff of over 175 employees includes a dynamic group of experienced attorneys and leaders recognized throughout the industry as experts in bankruptcy servicing. Becket & Lee has serviced bankrupt accounts since 1984, with an emphasis on consumer debt. Unlike other law firms and collection agencies, all of our resources, processes and staff are focused on maximizing our clients' bankruptcy recoveries. We do not purchase our clients' accounts, thus avoiding any possible conflict of interest. Our goal is to provide service and advice to each of our clients as if we were an in-house bankruptcy department.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm

550 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 530, Houston, Texas, 77027, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Sutliff & Stout is dedicated to helping clients achieve their legal goals through civil litigation. Our firm brings and defends lawsuits in courts and tribunals in Texas and across the United States, on matters spanning a variety of practice areas and industries. To learn more, please visit our website.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/becket-&-lee-llp.jpeg
Becket & Lee LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutliff-&-stout-pllc.jpeg
Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Becket & Lee LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Becket & Lee LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — Becket & Lee LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Becket & Lee LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/becket-&-lee-llp.jpeg
Becket & Lee LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutliff-&-stout-pllc.jpeg
Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Becket & Lee LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Becket & Lee LLP company.

In the current year, Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company and Becket & Lee LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company nor Becket & Lee LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company nor Becket & Lee LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company nor Becket & Lee LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP company nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP company nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Becket & Lee LLP company employs more people globally than Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Becket & Lee LLP nor Sutliff & Stout, Injury & Accident Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X