Comparison Overview

Becker's Fabrication

VS

Schreur Printing & Mailing

Becker's Fabrication

22465 E. La Palma Ave., Yorba Linda, CA, 92887, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.beckersfab.com

Becker's Fabrication is a commercial printer supplying customers with durable labels, overlays, membrane switches and die-cut gaskets. Our business centers around working with our customers to define their needs and then offering flexibility for the supply of the parts by using just in time delivery, Kanban or other methods to best suit their manufacturing delivery needs. Through intelligent investment in equipment, we have been able to grow dramatically without having to add significantly to our overhead. We have consciously set ourselves up to serve both small all large quantity production runs. This allows us to offer competitive pricing and keep our products manufactured in the United States by our outstanding employees. Industries served, but are not limited to: OEMs, Medical, Aerospace, Industrial, Cosmetics, High End Consumer, and Electronics Manufacturers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Schreur Printing & Mailing

10861 Paw Paw Dr, Holland, Michigan, 49424, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.schreurprinting.com

Every day the staff at Schreur Printing & Mailing works to do one thing: Make your life easier by providing you with solutions to all your printing needs. Need concept ideas or design assistance? We can help. Need a full range of printing products and services? We’ve got them. Do you want it all at competitive prices with outstanding customer service? You’re in the right place. Schreur has over 65 years of experience in helping their customers with all their printing needs. Drop by or contact us today. We have a solution for you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/becker's-fabrication.jpeg
Becker's Fabrication
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schreur-printing-&-mailing.jpeg
Schreur Printing & Mailing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Becker's Fabrication
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Schreur Printing & Mailing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Becker's Fabrication in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schreur Printing & Mailing in 2025.

Incident History — Becker's Fabrication (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Becker's Fabrication cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Schreur Printing & Mailing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schreur Printing & Mailing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/becker's-fabrication.jpeg
Becker's Fabrication
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schreur-printing-&-mailing.jpeg
Schreur Printing & Mailing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Becker's Fabrication company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Schreur Printing & Mailing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Schreur Printing & Mailing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Becker's Fabrication company.

In the current year, Schreur Printing & Mailing company and Becker's Fabrication company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Schreur Printing & Mailing company nor Becker's Fabrication company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Schreur Printing & Mailing company nor Becker's Fabrication company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Schreur Printing & Mailing company nor Becker's Fabrication company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Becker's Fabrication company nor Schreur Printing & Mailing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Becker's Fabrication nor Schreur Printing & Mailing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Becker's Fabrication company nor Schreur Printing & Mailing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Becker's Fabrication company employs more people globally than Schreur Printing & Mailing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Becker's Fabrication nor Schreur Printing & Mailing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Becker's Fabrication nor Schreur Printing & Mailing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Becker's Fabrication nor Schreur Printing & Mailing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Becker's Fabrication nor Schreur Printing & Mailing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Becker's Fabrication nor Schreur Printing & Mailing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Becker's Fabrication nor Schreur Printing & Mailing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References