Comparison Overview

Bearing Service Company

VS

Steelstruct Engineering

Bearing Service Company

630 Alpha Dr, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15238, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bearing-service.com

+85 Years of Service - Founded in 1933 Full Line Industrial Bearing & Power Transmission Distributor ISO 9001 Certified Bearing Manufacturer ISO 9001 Certified Bearing Repair Our Mission: Provide quality bearings and related products at fair prices with superior customer service. We pledge to conduct business with integrity and to continue to develop technology that promotes reliable service from the critical parts we supply on time. The driving force behind Bearing Service Company has always been our customers. We are committed to helping you avoid downtime and increase profits. By understanding our customers and concentrating on precision manufacturing and superior service, we ensure we will meet your needs today and tomorrow.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Steelstruct Engineering

36 Stuart Dr, Henderson, Western Australia, 6166, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.steelstruct.com.au

Steelstruct Engineering (est.1979) is a privately owned, highly regarded Western Australian company providing steel fabrication, hardfacing and precision machining services to Australia’s mining and resource markets. We manufacture from our modern, fully equipped workshops strategically located at Henderson (WA), Maddington (WA), Yarloop (WA) and Rayong (Thailand) totalling 13,400m2 under roof. We have been delivering our integrated capabilities to Australia’s largest mining, mineral processing and equipment providers for forty years, reinforcing our market reputation as a leader in service and value. At Steelstruct we believe no business priority comes before safety. We maintain best practice policies and procedures to provide and promote a healthy and safe work environment for all employees and contractors. We invest strongly in our people, processes and technology to ensure that our business continues to deliver sustainable ongoing value to our customers. Our customers are serviced by a stable and long term senior management team whose proven experience and skill sets are congruent with our clients’ high expectations of on time deliverables and quality outcomes. All of our business’s services are provided in accordance with our accredited (ISO 9001:2015) Quality Management System. We ensure that appropriate planning and resources are committed to ensure that we deliver high quality services safely and on schedule.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bearing-service-company.jpeg
Bearing Service Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steelstruct-engineering.jpeg
Steelstruct Engineering
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bearing Service Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Steelstruct Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bearing Service Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Steelstruct Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Bearing Service Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bearing Service Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Steelstruct Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Steelstruct Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bearing-service-company.jpeg
Bearing Service Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steelstruct-engineering.jpeg
Steelstruct Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bearing Service Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Steelstruct Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Steelstruct Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bearing Service Company company.

In the current year, Steelstruct Engineering company and Bearing Service Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Steelstruct Engineering company nor Bearing Service Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Steelstruct Engineering company nor Bearing Service Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Steelstruct Engineering company nor Bearing Service Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bearing Service Company company nor Steelstruct Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bearing Service Company nor Steelstruct Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bearing Service Company company nor Steelstruct Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bearing Service Company company employs more people globally than Steelstruct Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Bearing Service Company nor Steelstruct Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bearing Service Company nor Steelstruct Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bearing Service Company nor Steelstruct Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bearing Service Company nor Steelstruct Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bearing Service Company nor Steelstruct Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bearing Service Company nor Steelstruct Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References