Comparison Overview

Bear River Health

VS

Green Country Behavioral Health Services

Bear River Health

2329 Center St, Boyne Falls, Michigan, 49713, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://bearriverhealth.com

Bear River Health (BRH) offers compassionate Substance Abuse treatment. BRH is a private, tranquil five-acre campus with dedicated trail access to the scenic wilderness and calming water of Walloon Lake. Staffed by a consortium of highly skilled, like-minded professional care givers who understand that the body, mind, spirit and emotions all contribute to overall wellness during your recovery process and beyond. Our licensed clinicians, therapists, and support staff are heart-centered and compassionate.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Green Country Behavioral Health Services

619 N. Main St., None, Muskogee, OK, US, 74403
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://gcbhs.org/

We are a private, non-profit Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic (CCBHC) in Muskogee, Oklahoma, providing comprehensive outpatient and crisis services to individuals of all ages. We offer mental health and substance use disorder services for adults and children, including Medication Assisted Treatment for adults. GCBHS is the designated Health Home for children and adults in Muskogee and McIntosh Counties as well as a NARCAN hub for Muskogee County. No one is denied services because of inability to pay. Simply put, we are caring people, caring for others.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bear-river-health-at-walloon-lake.jpeg
Bear River Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-country-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Green Country Behavioral Health Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bear River Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Green Country Behavioral Health Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bear River Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Green Country Behavioral Health Services in 2026.

Incident History — Bear River Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bear River Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Green Country Behavioral Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Green Country Behavioral Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bear-river-health-at-walloon-lake.jpeg
Bear River Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/green-country-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Green Country Behavioral Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bear River Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Green Country Behavioral Health Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Green Country Behavioral Health Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bear River Health company.

In the current year, Green Country Behavioral Health Services company and Bear River Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Green Country Behavioral Health Services company nor Bear River Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Green Country Behavioral Health Services company nor Bear River Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Green Country Behavioral Health Services company nor Bear River Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bear River Health company nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bear River Health nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bear River Health company nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bear River Health company employs more people globally than Green Country Behavioral Health Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Bear River Health nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bear River Health nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bear River Health nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bear River Health nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bear River Health nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bear River Health nor Green Country Behavioral Health Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References