Comparison Overview

Beamish Museum

VS

Deutsche Oper am Rhein

Beamish Museum

REGIONAL RESOURCE CENTRE, BEAMISH, COUNTY DURHAM, DH9 0RG, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Beamish is a world famous open air museum telling the story of the people of North East England during the 1820s, early 1900s, 1940s and 1950s. Beamish isn't a traditional museum - you won't find objects displayed in glass cases and there are no labels. At Beamish buildings collected from across the region are filled with objects illustrating the region's history, many donated by local people to help the Museum tell their story. Costumed staff and volunteers use these collections to create a living, working Museum that tells the story of everyday life in the North East of England through time. Our focus is on people and creating an authentic, immersive experience of the region's past - an experience that constantly changes with each season.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 162
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Deutsche Oper am Rhein

Heinrich-Heine-Allee 16a, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, DE, 40213
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Deutsche Oper am Rhein Düsseldorf Duisburg GmbH is a theatre community serving the cities of Düsseldorf and Duisburg that represents a lengthy tradition of collaboration between these two urban centres. Ever since it was founded in 1956 it has been regarded as one of Germany’s leading opera houses. With an ensemble of top quality soloists, distinguished chorus and the nationally- and internationally-acclaimed Ballett am Rhein company, it has evolved into one of Europe’s premier addresses for both opera and dance. Its home lies within one of Germany’s largest and most densely populated cultural regions. The two cities of Düsseldorf and Duisburg alone account for almost 1.1 million inhabitants, but numerous neighbouring districts and a large number of outside visitors also benefit from the range of excellent work offered by the Deutsche Oper am Rhein. operamrhein.de

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beamish-museum.jpeg
Beamish Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-oper-am-rhein.jpeg
Deutsche Oper am Rhein
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beamish Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Deutsche Oper am Rhein
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beamish Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Oper am Rhein in 2026.

Incident History — Beamish Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beamish Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Deutsche Oper am Rhein (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Oper am Rhein cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beamish-museum.jpeg
Beamish Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-oper-am-rhein.jpeg
Deutsche Oper am Rhein
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Beamish Museum company and Deutsche Oper am Rhein company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Deutsche Oper am Rhein company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Beamish Museum company.

In the current year, Deutsche Oper am Rhein company and Beamish Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Deutsche Oper am Rhein company nor Beamish Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Deutsche Oper am Rhein company nor Beamish Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Deutsche Oper am Rhein company nor Beamish Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beamish Museum company nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beamish Museum nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Beamish Museum company nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Beamish Museum company employs more people globally than Deutsche Oper am Rhein company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Beamish Museum nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beamish Museum nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beamish Museum nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beamish Museum nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beamish Museum nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beamish Museum nor Deutsche Oper am Rhein holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H