Comparison Overview

Beaconhouse Group

VS

Lovely Professional University

Beaconhouse Group

10-11 Gurumangat Road Gulberg III Lahore, Punjab 54000, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

The Beaconhouse School System has risen from its modest beginnings in 1975 as Les Anges Montessori Academy to become a major force in the education world. With an ever-expanding base, already established in Malaysia, the Philippines, Pakistan, the UAE, Oman, Belgium and Thailand, Beaconhouse is one of the largest private school networks in the world.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lovely Professional University

Jalandhar - Delhi G.T. Road (NH-1, Phagwara, Punjab, IN, 144411
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Lovely Professional University (LPU) is an ASSOCHAM’s National Education Excellence Award-winning institution and has also been ranked as top Education Brand of India in Economic Times. LPU is a multi-disciplined university and offers 200+ programs in 40+ disciplines. These programs are recognized by the statutory bodies of the Government of India in diverse fields of higher education including National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), Distance Education Council (DEC), Pharmacy Council of India (PCI), Council of Architecture (COA) and Bar Council of India (BCI). LPU has been created keeping the student aspiration and industrial requirement in mind. The infrastructure, curriculum, pedagogy and faculty work in synchronization to fulfil the motto and goal of the institution. The curriculum development involves multiple stages of refinement and one of the most important steps is the industry feedback. LPU has set the record for the highest placements in any of the North Indian universities three times in a row. Cognizant alone has taken 1900 students in three years from LPU. Presently LPU students are working worldwide with prestigious global companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and many more at salary packages of more than Rs one Crore. LPU’s infrastructure is unparalleled to any of the universities in India. It is a mini township. It has fantastic academic facilities, an eight-storied library and research block, hostel and accommodation facilities for over 20,000 students, a shopping mall, numerous eateries including brands like Domino’s and Café Coffee Day, plenty of workshop area, India’s first iMac Lab and various other facilities for students to grow and accomplish their goals. The university has recently invested hugely on its security systems and has stepped forward to become one of the safest campuses in the world.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 10,642
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beaconhouse-group.jpeg
Beaconhouse Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovely-professional-university.jpeg
Lovely Professional University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Beaconhouse Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lovely Professional University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beaconhouse Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lovely Professional University in 2025.

Incident History — Beaconhouse Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beaconhouse Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lovely Professional University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lovely Professional University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/beaconhouse-group.jpeg
Beaconhouse Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovely-professional-university.jpeg
Lovely Professional University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lovely Professional University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Beaconhouse Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lovely Professional University company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Beaconhouse Group company.

In the current year, Lovely Professional University company and Beaconhouse Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lovely Professional University company nor Beaconhouse Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lovely Professional University company nor Beaconhouse Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lovely Professional University company nor Beaconhouse Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Beaconhouse Group company nor Lovely Professional University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Beaconhouse Group nor Lovely Professional University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Beaconhouse Group company nor Lovely Professional University company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lovely Professional University company employs more people globally than Beaconhouse Group company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Neither Beaconhouse Group nor Lovely Professional University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Beaconhouse Group nor Lovely Professional University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Beaconhouse Group nor Lovely Professional University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Beaconhouse Group nor Lovely Professional University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Beaconhouse Group nor Lovely Professional University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Beaconhouse Group nor Lovely Professional University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H