Comparison Overview

BCT Heartland

VS

Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp

BCT Heartland

2540 24th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://website.bctminneapolis.com/

BCT Heartland is a wholesale printer to the trade specializing in the printing of stationery, business cards, and promotional products utilizing both digital and traditional offset presses. The company, part of a nationwide franchise system, is one of the largest in a network of over 45 locations in the United States and Canada. BCT Heartland has printing locations in Minneapolis and Milwaukee that serve a seven-state area including Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp

79 Madison Avenue, New York,, NY, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.optamarkgraphics.com

Optamark is an award-winning online print business that is dedicated to providing clients a seamless integration of their printing & marketing services under one roof. Launched in 2011, Optamark aims to disrupt the $640 billion global print industry by combining the traditional print methods both offset and digital with a full range of product from printing, signage, promotional and creative. Implementing innovation to a 500 year-old market, Optamark has become one of the fastest growing full service printing & marketing agencies in the world. With offices in both the United States & India, Optamark offers global support around the clock. Optamark facilitates any and all types of printing/promotional/signage product needs. Anything with ink on it, Optamark can and will be able to print and deliver a quality end product at a competitive price. The company has won several awards for their involvement in disrupting the current printing industry & is focusing on continued growth.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bct-heartland.jpeg
BCT Heartland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/optamark-printing-&-marketing-corp.jpeg
Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BCT Heartland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BCT Heartland in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp in 2025.

Incident History — BCT Heartland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCT Heartland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bct-heartland.jpeg
BCT Heartland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/optamark-printing-&-marketing-corp.jpeg
Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BCT Heartland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BCT Heartland company.

In the current year, Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company and BCT Heartland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company nor BCT Heartland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company nor BCT Heartland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company nor BCT Heartland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BCT Heartland company nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BCT Heartland nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BCT Heartland company nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp company employs more people globally than BCT Heartland company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither BCT Heartland nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BCT Heartland nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BCT Heartland nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BCT Heartland nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BCT Heartland nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BCT Heartland nor Optamark Printing & Marketing Corp holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References