Comparison Overview

BCLC

VS

Cayetano Gaming

BCLC

74 Seymour Street West, Kamloops, BC, V2C 1E2, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For 35 years, BCLC has been delivering exceptional entertainment to British Columbians by managing casino, lottery, bingo and sports betting. Thanks to our players, we’ve generated $28 billion for the Province of B.C. to support essential services such as healthcare, education and community programs. Our employees are in on the action too! Overall, BCLC staff spent more than 3,830 hours volunteering for local charities. Our employee-giving committees continue to organize events, silent auctions and draws to fundraise for important local causes selected by our people. We want everyone to enjoy gambling—and that means understanding how to play in a healthy way. We provide educational resources on how gambling works, and we help find support for those who need it.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 1,337
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cayetano Gaming

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Cayetano Gaming is a leading provider of online casino software. We create games with maximum player appeal that are distributed via multiple internet channels. Our games are used by some of the biggest and most successful gaming operators to drive revenue and increase player retention. With superior graphics, exciting audio effects and engaging themes, Cayetano's games challenge industry standards. Our game library is expanding fast with several new titles released every month. Our games team is constantly creating new video slot machine games with fun graphics, surprising game play and generous prizes. We also offer a suite of traditional online casino games including Blackjack, Roulette, Craps plus other table games, scratch cards, lottery games, video poker, mini-games, arcade games and more.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bclc.jpeg
BCLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cayetano-gaming.jpeg
Cayetano Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BCLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cayetano Gaming
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BCLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cayetano Gaming in 2025.

Incident History — BCLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cayetano Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cayetano Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bclc.jpeg
BCLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cayetano-gaming.jpeg
Cayetano Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cayetano Gaming company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BCLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cayetano Gaming company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BCLC company.

In the current year, Cayetano Gaming company and BCLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cayetano Gaming company nor BCLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cayetano Gaming company nor BCLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cayetano Gaming company nor BCLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BCLC company nor Cayetano Gaming company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BCLC nor Cayetano Gaming holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BCLC company nor Cayetano Gaming company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BCLC company employs more people globally than Cayetano Gaming company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither BCLC nor Cayetano Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BCLC nor Cayetano Gaming holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BCLC nor Cayetano Gaming holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BCLC nor Cayetano Gaming holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BCLC nor Cayetano Gaming holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BCLC nor Cayetano Gaming holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H