Comparison Overview

BCD Travel

VS

MSC Cruises

BCD Travel

Europalaan 300, Utrecht, NL, 3526 KS
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

BCD Travel helps companies travel smart and achieve more. We drive program adoption, cost savings and talent retention through digital experiences that simplify business travel. Our 15,000+ dedicated team members service clients in 170+ countries as we shape a sustainable future for business travel. BCD’s leading meetings and events management and global consultancy services complete our comprehensive suite of solutions for all aspects of corporate travel. In 2024, BCD achieved US$22.9 billion in sales. For more information, visit our website. You can also subscribe to our newsletter for the latest industry insights, thought-leader analysis and top tips to drive your successful travel program. Go to: http://ow.ly/N73i50Mhc9Y

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 16,649
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

MSC Cruises

Avenue Eugene Pittard, Geneva, 1206, CH
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, MSC Cruises is the world’s third largest cruise lines and the market leader in Europe, South America, the Middle East and Southern Africa, with a strong and growing presence in North America and the Far East. The MSC Cruises fleet consists of 23 modern ships with four new vessels due to be launched in 2026, 2027, 2029 and 2030. The Company operates in more than 100 countries around the world, offering cruises across five continents, calling at more than 240 destinations and welcoming more than 180 different nationalities on board. MSC Cruises is firmly committed to achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions for its marine operations by 2050.

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 18,545
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcd-travel.jpeg
BCD Travel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msc-cruises.jpeg
MSC Cruises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BCD Travel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MSC Cruises
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BCD Travel in 2026.

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSC Cruises in 2026.

Incident History — BCD Travel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCD Travel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MSC Cruises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSC Cruises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bcd-travel.jpeg
BCD Travel
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msc-cruises.jpeg
MSC Cruises
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MSC Cruises company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BCD Travel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BCD Travel company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MSC Cruises company has not reported any.

In the current year, MSC Cruises company and BCD Travel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MSC Cruises company nor BCD Travel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MSC Cruises company nor BCD Travel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MSC Cruises company nor BCD Travel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

BCD Travel company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while MSC Cruises company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BCD Travel nor MSC Cruises holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BCD Travel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MSC Cruises company.

MSC Cruises company employs more people globally than BCD Travel company, reflecting its scale as a Travel Arrangements.

Neither BCD Travel nor MSC Cruises holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BCD Travel nor MSC Cruises holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BCD Travel nor MSC Cruises holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BCD Travel nor MSC Cruises holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BCD Travel nor MSC Cruises holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BCD Travel nor MSC Cruises holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.