Comparison Overview

BBVA

VS

ANZ

BBVA

Plaza de San Nicolas 4, Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48005, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.bbva.com/es/empleo/

At BBVA we are leading the transformation of banking worldwide, united in pursuing our goal of bringing the age of opportunity to everyone. Firmly focused on the future, our on-going digital transformation is already producing disruptive innovations that power our vision of banking. Every one of our 121,486 employees, from branch staff to senior leaders, plays an essential role in giving our 71.5 million customers the cutting edge banking solutions that they deserve. Building on 166 years of history we know the importance of constant development, which is why we place so much confidence in the collaborative working environment that enables our people to grow and excel. If you would like to learn about the culture and opportunities on offer at a company that is leading the way for 21st century banking, head to the ‘Life’ tab to find out more.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 119,358
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ANZ

833 Collins Street, Docklands, Melbourne, 3008, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.anz.com

ANZ has a proud heritage of more than 180 years. Our purpose is to shape a world where people and communities thrive. That is why we strive to create a balanced, sustainable economy in which everyone can take part and build a better life. We employ more than 50,000 people and have our global headquarters in Melbourne. ANZ is among the top 4 banks in Australia, the largest banking group in New Zealand and Pacific, and among the top 50 banks in the world. Follow us elsewhere for our latest news: facebook.com/ANZAustralia facebook.com/ANZNewZealand twitter.com/ANZ_AU twitter.com/ANZ_NZ twitter.com/ANZ_Media twitter.com/ANZ_BlueNotes twitter.com/ANZ_Research instagram.com/anz_au bluenotes.anz.com

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 51,422
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbva.jpeg
BBVA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anz.jpeg
ANZ
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BBVA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ANZ
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BBVA in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANZ in 2025.

Incident History — BBVA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BBVA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ANZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbva.jpeg
BBVA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anz.jpeg
ANZ
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BBVA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ANZ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ANZ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BBVA company.

In the current year, ANZ company and BBVA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ANZ company nor BBVA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ANZ company nor BBVA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ANZ company nor BBVA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BBVA company nor ANZ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BBVA nor ANZ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BBVA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ANZ company.

BBVA company employs more people globally than ANZ company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither BBVA nor ANZ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BBVA nor ANZ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BBVA nor ANZ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BBVA nor ANZ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BBVA nor ANZ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BBVA nor ANZ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References