Comparison Overview

BBVA en México

VS

Synchrony

BBVA en México

Av. Paseo de la Reforma 510, Juárez, Cuauhtémoc, Ciudad de México, undefined, 06600, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bbva.mx/

Bienvenido a la página oficial del Banco BBVA Bancomer. Institución financiera de México desde 1932. Es una empresa filial de Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA), uno de los grupos financieros líderes en Europa y considerado entre uno de los más grandes de la Zona Euro. El Grupo trabaja por un futuro mejor para las personas, al ofrecer a su clientela una relación de beneficio mutuo, servicio proactivo, asesoramiento y soluciones integrales con una amplia variedad de productos y servicios financieros.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,743
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Synchrony

HQ, Stamford, Connecticut, US, 06902
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.synchrony.com

At Synchrony, our driving force is to be essential to people's everyday lives by making it easier for the many millions of people who rely on us to access their essential needs and everyday wants with consumer financing that works for them – from their first credit card to a lifetime of flexibility. We do this by helping people make informed, smart credit choices so they can live healthier financial lives and by connecting them to Synchrony's ecosystem of hundreds of thousands of small- and mid-sized businesses and health and wellness providers that are the backbone of the U.S. economy.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 15,628
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbva-mexico.jpeg
BBVA en México
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synchrony-financial.jpeg
Synchrony
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BBVA en México
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Synchrony
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BBVA en México in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Synchrony in 2025.

Incident History — BBVA en México (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BBVA en México cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Synchrony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Synchrony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbva-mexico.jpeg
BBVA en México
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/synchrony-financial.jpeg
Synchrony
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

BBVA en México company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Synchrony company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Synchrony company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BBVA en México company has not reported any.

In the current year, Synchrony company and BBVA en México company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Synchrony company nor BBVA en México company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Synchrony company has disclosed at least one data breach, while BBVA en México company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Synchrony company nor BBVA en México company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BBVA en México company nor Synchrony company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BBVA en México nor Synchrony holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BBVA en México company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Synchrony company.

BBVA en México company employs more people globally than Synchrony company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither BBVA en México nor Synchrony holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Synchrony holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Synchrony holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Synchrony holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Synchrony holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Synchrony holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References