Comparison Overview

BBVA en México

VS

Dubai Holding

BBVA en México

Av. Paseo de la Reforma 510, Juárez, Cuauhtémoc, Ciudad de México, undefined, 06600, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Bienvenido a la página oficial del Banco BBVA Bancomer. Institución financiera de México desde 1932. Es una empresa filial de Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA), uno de los grupos financieros líderes en Europa y considerado entre uno de los más grandes de la Zona Euro. El Grupo trabaja por un futuro mejor para las personas, al ofrecer a su clientela una relación de beneficio mutuo, servicio proactivo, asesoramiento y soluciones integrales con una amplia variedad de productos y servicios financieros.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,743
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dubai Holding

Umm Suqeim Road, across from Madinat Jumeirah, Dubai, Dubai, AE, 66000
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Dubai Holding is a diversified global investment company that continues to power Dubai’s growth across 10 key sectors, including real estate, hospitality, leisure & entertainment, media, ICT, design, education, retail, manufacturing & logistics and science. Since 2004, we have made strides with an effective strategy aimed at supporting an innovation-driven, knowledge-based economy. This is in line with Dubai’s long-term ambition of becoming a leading global hub for business and tourism. Follow our journey as we invest in making a lasting impact on Dubai, its people and our economy #ForTheGoodofTomorrow .

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 13,269
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbva-mexico.jpeg
BBVA en México
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dubai-holding.jpeg
Dubai Holding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BBVA en México
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dubai Holding
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BBVA en México in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dubai Holding in 2025.

Incident History — BBVA en México (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BBVA en México cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dubai Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dubai Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbva-mexico.jpeg
BBVA en México
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dubai-holding.jpeg
Dubai Holding
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BBVA en México company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dubai Holding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dubai Holding company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BBVA en México company.

In the current year, Dubai Holding company and BBVA en México company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dubai Holding company nor BBVA en México company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dubai Holding company nor BBVA en México company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dubai Holding company nor BBVA en México company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BBVA en México company nor Dubai Holding company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BBVA en México nor Dubai Holding holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BBVA en México company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dubai Holding company.

BBVA en México company employs more people globally than Dubai Holding company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither BBVA en México nor Dubai Holding holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Dubai Holding holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Dubai Holding holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Dubai Holding holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Dubai Holding holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BBVA en México nor Dubai Holding holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N