Comparison Overview

BBA//Fjeldco

VS

Ocorian Law

BBA//Fjeldco

Katrínartún 2, 19th floor, Reykjavík, Capital Region, IS, 105
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

BBA//Fjeldco is a first-class, full-spectrum corporate law firm, providing a full range of legal services. We focus on delivering high-quality legal advice with a pragmatic and business-focused approach. BBA//Fjeldco is leading in the field of mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, banking and corporate finance, energy and PFI projects, as well as general corporate and commercial matters. We have been entrusted by our local and international clients to provide advice on many of Iceland’s biggest and most complicated financing and M&A deals, as well as the country's most important PFI and energy projects. Our reputation in these areas of legal practice has resulted in a continuous top-tier ranking by all of the major ranking firms during the last decade. With offices in Iceland, the UK, and France, our team of specialised business lawyers hold qualifications in Iceland, England, France, California, and New York. Our team's international qualifications, combined with our UK and France offices and an extensive network of global law firms, banks, investment funds, engineering firms, and other consultants, make BBA//Fjeldco the ideal partner for any cross-border transactions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ocorian Law

Windward 3, Regatta Office Park, 5th Floor, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY, KY1-1108
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Ocorian Law has an office in the Cayman Islands. We advise on the laws of BVI and the Cayman Islands. Our main practice areas are funds, insurance, corporate, capital markets, finance and private client. We also advise on a broad range of related commercial matters and in the specialist areas of regulatory law and compliance and intellectual property. Our clients include financial institutions, insurance companies, international corporations, investment managers, venture capital firms and high net worth individuals.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bba-fjeldco.jpeg
BBA//Fjeldco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ocorianlaw.jpeg
Ocorian Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BBA//Fjeldco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ocorian Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BBA//Fjeldco in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ocorian Law in 2025.

Incident History — BBA//Fjeldco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BBA//Fjeldco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ocorian Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ocorian Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bba-fjeldco.jpeg
BBA//Fjeldco
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ocorianlaw.jpeg
Ocorian Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BBA//Fjeldco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ocorian Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ocorian Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BBA//Fjeldco company.

In the current year, Ocorian Law company and BBA//Fjeldco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ocorian Law company nor BBA//Fjeldco company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ocorian Law company nor BBA//Fjeldco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ocorian Law company nor BBA//Fjeldco company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BBA//Fjeldco company nor Ocorian Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BBA//Fjeldco nor Ocorian Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BBA//Fjeldco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ocorian Law company.

BBA//Fjeldco company employs more people globally than Ocorian Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither BBA//Fjeldco nor Ocorian Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BBA//Fjeldco nor Ocorian Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BBA//Fjeldco nor Ocorian Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BBA//Fjeldco nor Ocorian Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BBA//Fjeldco nor Ocorian Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BBA//Fjeldco nor Ocorian Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X