Comparison Overview

BB&T

VS

Ally

BB&T

214 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bbt.com

We’d love to stay connected with you! Please follow our Truist company page and unfollow this page which is no longer active. BB&T and SunTrust formed Truist with a shared purpose—to inspire and build better lives and communities. With our combined resources, collective passion, and commitment to innovation, we’re creating a better financial experience to help people and businesses achieve more. With 275 years of combined BB&T and SunTrust history, Truist serves approximately 12 million households with leading market share in many high growth markets in the country. The company offers a wide range of services including retail, small business and commercial banking; asset management; capital markets; commercial real estate; corporate and institutional banking; insurance; mortgage; payments; specialized lending; and wealth management. Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, Truist is the sixth-largest commercial bank in the U.S. Truist Bank, Member FDIC. Learn more at Truist.com and see social media terms and conditions at Truist.com/SocialTerms.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 13,573
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ally

500 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI, US, 48226
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ally.com

Ally Financial Inc. (NYSE: ALLY) is a leading digital financial services company and a top 25 U.S. financial holding company offering financial products for consumers, businesses, automotive dealers and corporate clients. NMLS #3015 | #181005 | https://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org/ Ally's legacy dates back to 1919, and the company was redesigned in 2009 with a distinctive brand, innovative approach and relentless focus on its customers. Ally has an award-winning online bank (Ally Bank, Member FDIC), one of the largest full service auto finance operations in the country, a complementary auto-focused insurance business, and a trusted corporate finance business offering capital for equity sponsors and middle-market companies. We extend equal employment opportunities to qualified applicants and employees on an equal basis regardless of an individual’s age, race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, pregnancy status, marital status, military or veteran status, genetic disposition or any other reason protected by law.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 15,070
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bb&t.jpeg
BB&T
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ally.jpeg
Ally
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BB&T
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ally
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BB&T in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ally in 2026.

Incident History — BB&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BB&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ally (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ally cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bb&t.jpeg
BB&T
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ally.jpeg
Ally
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Wrongdoing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Programming Code Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party supplier error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

BB&T company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ally company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ally company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BB&T company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ally company and BB&T company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ally company nor BB&T company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Ally company has disclosed at least one data breach, while BB&T company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ally company nor BB&T company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BB&T company nor Ally company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BB&T nor Ally holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BB&T company nor Ally company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ally company employs more people globally than BB&T company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither BB&T nor Ally holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BB&T nor Ally holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BB&T nor Ally holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BB&T nor Ally holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BB&T nor Ally holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BB&T nor Ally holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References