Comparison Overview

Bazar Forlag

VS

Inside FMCG

Bazar Forlag

Jernbanetorget 4a, Oslo, NO
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Bazar Publishers was established in Norway, Sweden and Finland in 2002. The fact that it is an exciting and multifarious publishing house was the reason why we chose to name it Bazar. Our aim is to publish literature of high quality from all over the world. Our publishing house has several bestselling authors: Dan Brown, Ildefonso Falcones, Bernard Cornwell, Tatiana de Rosnay, Cecelia Samartin, Keith Richards, Katherine Pancol and Cecelia Ahern, to mention some of the most important.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Inside FMCG

Level 10, 51-57 PITT ST, Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2000
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Inside FMCG is a new daily news source for those in the business of grocery, convenience, pharmacy, and impulse shopping. Tracing its rich history back 60 years from its roots as Foodweek, Inside FMCG has recreated itself in 2015 to become the most current source of industry news and events in the industry. Inside FMCG publishes breaking news on the FMCG sector and reports on product and campaign news, and research insights that are new, useful, and making a difference among both local and international FMCG brands and retailers.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bazar-forlag.jpeg
Bazar Forlag
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insidefmcg.jpeg
Inside FMCG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bazar Forlag
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inside FMCG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bazar Forlag in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inside FMCG in 2025.

Incident History — Bazar Forlag (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bazar Forlag cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inside FMCG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inside FMCG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bazar-forlag.jpeg
Bazar Forlag
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insidefmcg.jpeg
Inside FMCG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bazar Forlag company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Inside FMCG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Inside FMCG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bazar Forlag company.

In the current year, Inside FMCG company and Bazar Forlag company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Inside FMCG company nor Bazar Forlag company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Inside FMCG company nor Bazar Forlag company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inside FMCG company nor Bazar Forlag company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bazar Forlag company nor Inside FMCG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bazar Forlag nor Inside FMCG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bazar Forlag company nor Inside FMCG company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bazar Forlag company employs more people globally than Inside FMCG company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Bazar Forlag nor Inside FMCG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bazar Forlag nor Inside FMCG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bazar Forlag nor Inside FMCG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bazar Forlag nor Inside FMCG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bazar Forlag nor Inside FMCG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bazar Forlag nor Inside FMCG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.