Comparison Overview

Bayside Historical Society

VS

Museo de Antioquia

Bayside Historical Society

208 Totten Avenue, Bayside, NY, 11359, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Bayside Historical Society was founded in 1964 to collect, preserve, and disseminate information concerning the history of Bayside and its adjacent communities; advocate for the preservation and protection of its most historic structures and distinctive neighborhoods through the landmarking process; and strive to develop a broad constituency of like-minded preservation and educational organizations to protect the historic integrity of our communities and collections.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museo de Antioquia

Carrera 52 N. 52-43, Medellín, 00000, CO
Last Update: 2026-01-22

El Museo de Antioquia es el museo más importante de Medellín, y uno de los más conocidos de Colombia. Fue el primero fundado en el departamento de Antioquia, el segundo en el país. Sus colecciones reposan en pleno centro de Medellín, frente a la plaza Botero, cerca de la Estación Parque Berrío del metro. El Museo de Antioquia, es reconocido por ser la casa de la Donación Botero, Maestro Fernando Botero, aunque posee otras obras, de incalculable valor histórico y artístico.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayside-historical-society.jpeg
Bayside Historical Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-de-antioquia.jpeg
Museo de Antioquia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bayside Historical Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museo de Antioquia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bayside Historical Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museo de Antioquia in 2026.

Incident History — Bayside Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bayside Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museo de Antioquia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museo de Antioquia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayside-historical-society.jpeg
Bayside Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-de-antioquia.jpeg
Museo de Antioquia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bayside Historical Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museo de Antioquia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museo de Antioquia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bayside Historical Society company.

In the current year, Museo de Antioquia company and Bayside Historical Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor Bayside Historical Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor Bayside Historical Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museo de Antioquia company nor Bayside Historical Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bayside Historical Society company nor Museo de Antioquia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bayside Historical Society nor Museo de Antioquia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bayside Historical Society company nor Museo de Antioquia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museo de Antioquia company employs more people globally than Bayside Historical Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Bayside Historical Society nor Museo de Antioquia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bayside Historical Society nor Museo de Antioquia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bayside Historical Society nor Museo de Antioquia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bayside Historical Society nor Museo de Antioquia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bayside Historical Society nor Museo de Antioquia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bayside Historical Society nor Museo de Antioquia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H