Comparison Overview

Bayhealth

VS

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Bayhealth

640 S State St, Dover, DE, US, 19901
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 550 and 599

Bayhealth’s mission is to strengthen the health of our community, one life at a time. As central and southern Delaware’s largest healthcare system, Bayhealth is comprised of Bayhealth Hospital, Kent Campus and Bayhealth Hospital, Sussex Campus, the freestanding Emergency Department in Smyrna as well as numerous satellite facilities and employed physician practices encompassing a variety of specialties. Bayhealth is a technologically advanced not-for-profit healthcare system with more than 4,000 employees and a medical staff of more than 400 physicians. In Fiscal Year 2020, Bayhealth recorded 96,820 emergency department visits, 18,574 patients admitted to beds, 2,241 births, and provided $68.16 million in unreimbursed care to patients.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 2,454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

34th St. and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, 19104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Since its start in 1855 as the nation's first hospital devoted exclusively to caring for children, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia has been the birthplace for many dramatic firsts in pediatric medicine. The Hospital has fostered medical discoveries and innovations that have improved pediatric healthcare and saved countless children’s lives. Today, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is one of the leading pediatric hospitals and research facilities in the world. Our 150 years of innovation and service to our patients, their families and our community reflect an ongoing commitment to exceptional patient care, training new generations of pediatric healthcare providers and pioneering significant research initiatives.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,370
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayhealth-medical-center.jpeg
Bayhealth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-childrens-hospital-of-philadelphia.jpeg
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bayhealth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bayhealth in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in 2025.

Incident History — Bayhealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bayhealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayhealth-medical-center.jpeg
Bayhealth
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Gootloader Malware (initial access), Network Intrusion
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft for Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-childrens-hospital-of-philadelphia.jpeg
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bayhealth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bayhealth company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company and Bayhealth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Bayhealth company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company nor Bayhealth company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company nor Bayhealth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bayhealth company nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bayhealth nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bayhealth company nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia company employs more people globally than Bayhealth company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Bayhealth nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L