Comparison Overview

Bayhealth

VS

Omega Healthcare Management Services

Bayhealth

640 S State St, Dover, DE, US, 19901
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 550 and 599

Bayhealth’s mission is to strengthen the health of our community, one life at a time. As central and southern Delaware’s largest healthcare system, Bayhealth is comprised of Bayhealth Hospital, Kent Campus and Bayhealth Hospital, Sussex Campus, the freestanding Emergency Department in Smyrna as well as numerous satellite facilities and employed physician practices encompassing a variety of specialties. Bayhealth is a technologically advanced not-for-profit healthcare system with more than 4,000 employees and a medical staff of more than 400 physicians. In Fiscal Year 2020, Bayhealth recorded 96,820 emergency department visits, 18,574 patients admitted to beds, 2,241 births, and provided $68.16 million in unreimbursed care to patients.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 2,454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Omega Healthcare Management Services

2424 N Federal Hwy, Suite #205 , Boca Raton, Florida, US, 33431
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2003, Omega Healthcare Management Services® (Omega Healthcare) empowers healthcare to thrive via intelligent solutions that optimize revenue cycle operations, administrative workflows, care coordination, and clinical research on a global scale. The company works with providers, payers, life science companies, medical device manufacturers, health technology firms, researchers, and industry partners to amplify teams with robust technology, specialty expertise, and operational support. Omega Healthcare serves 350+ healthcare organizations with 35,000 skilled workers in the United States, India, Colombia, and the Philippines. For more information, visit www.omegahms.com End-to-End Revenue Cycle Management Solutions: Patient Access - Scheduling & Registration - Insurance Eligibility & Benefits Verification - Prior Authorization Mid-Revenue Cycle - Medical Records Coding - Charge Capture - Chart Audit - Chart Audits - Clinical Documentation Improvement - HCC Coding Review Business Office - Claims Management & Billing - Payment Posting & Reconciliation - A/R Management & Collections - Denials & Appeals Management - Underpayment Analysis & Recovery - Data Analytics Platform (WhiteSpace Analytics) Full Business Office Care Coordination - Remote Patient Monitoring - Telephone/Message Nurse Triage - Customer Contact Center Health Data Curation - Clinical Trial Data Solutions - Real-World Data Curation - AI/ML Model Validation and Enablement - Registry Data Management Payer Operations - Risk Adjustment Documentation & Coding Review - HEDIS Chart Abstraction - Care Coordination - Provider & Member Communication - Utilization Management - Claims Administration - Member Management - Provider Data & Network Management Pharma: Access - Member Enrollment - Benefit Verification - Prior Authorizations Affordability - Patient Co-pay Assistance Adherence - Care Coordination

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 24,031
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayhealth-medical-center.jpeg
Bayhealth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omega-healthcare-management-services.jpeg
Omega Healthcare Management Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bayhealth
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Omega Healthcare Management Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bayhealth in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omega Healthcare Management Services in 2025.

Incident History — Bayhealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bayhealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Omega Healthcare Management Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omega Healthcare Management Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayhealth-medical-center.jpeg
Bayhealth
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Gootloader Malware (initial access), Network Intrusion
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft for Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omega-healthcare-management-services.jpeg
Omega Healthcare Management Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Omega Healthcare Management Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bayhealth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bayhealth company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Omega Healthcare Management Services company has not reported any.

In the current year, Omega Healthcare Management Services company and Bayhealth company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Bayhealth company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Omega Healthcare Management Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Omega Healthcare Management Services company nor Bayhealth company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Omega Healthcare Management Services company nor Bayhealth company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bayhealth company nor Omega Healthcare Management Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bayhealth nor Omega Healthcare Management Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bayhealth company nor Omega Healthcare Management Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Omega Healthcare Management Services company employs more people globally than Bayhealth company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Bayhealth nor Omega Healthcare Management Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Omega Healthcare Management Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Omega Healthcare Management Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Omega Healthcare Management Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Omega Healthcare Management Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bayhealth nor Omega Healthcare Management Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L