Comparison Overview

Bay Tech Label

VS

Zest Image

Bay Tech Label

12177 28th Street, St Petersburg, Florida, 33716, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

We convert pressure sensitive and tag material using state of the art flexographic printers.Your source for custom printed labels and tags. We specialize in the following industries: Industrial - Pharmaceutical - Electrical - Nutraceutical - Food Products And just about anything else imaginable up to 8 spot colors and 4 color process labels. We have full in-house design and graphics capabilities using MAC or PC software. We do short and long runs and we also offer 150 different materials and substrates to choose from. At Bay Tech Label, we keep abreast of rapidly changing technologies, continually investing in new equipment and providing our staff with ongoing training. We have two manufacturing facilities to serve you: It's extremely important to us that our clients know with whom they're doing business with. Once you take the time to find out what we're all about, we're confident you'll like what you see.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Zest Image

10 Longstaff Road, Bayswater, Victoria, 3153, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Zest Image is a quickly expanding bespoke visual solutions company based in Bayswater delivering innovative and often challenging visual solutions for many of Australia’s leading retail brands, quick service restaurants and demanding display environments. Zest Image designs, creates, manufactures and installs printed solutions plus custom signage for a wide range of high-profile customers. Our projects include digital print for retail store fitouts, major bespoke installations, architectural signage, vehicle wraps and beyond. We pride ourselves on innovation, growth, and taking on the industry’s most challenging projects throughout the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-tech-label-inc-.jpeg
Bay Tech Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zest-image.jpeg
Zest Image
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bay Tech Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Zest Image
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bay Tech Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zest Image in 2025.

Incident History — Bay Tech Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bay Tech Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Zest Image (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zest Image cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bay-tech-label-inc-.jpeg
Bay Tech Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zest-image.jpeg
Zest Image
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bay Tech Label company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zest Image company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Zest Image company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bay Tech Label company.

In the current year, Zest Image company and Bay Tech Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Zest Image company nor Bay Tech Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Zest Image company nor Bay Tech Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Zest Image company nor Bay Tech Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bay Tech Label company nor Zest Image company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bay Tech Label nor Zest Image holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bay Tech Label company nor Zest Image company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bay Tech Label company employs more people globally than Zest Image company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Bay Tech Label nor Zest Image holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bay Tech Label nor Zest Image holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bay Tech Label nor Zest Image holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bay Tech Label nor Zest Image holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bay Tech Label nor Zest Image holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bay Tech Label nor Zest Image holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N